Finra fines small B-D for misinformation in note sale

Finra fines small B-D for misinformation in note sale
WestPark Capital's information in the sale of $3.9 million worth of promissory notes was faulty, according to the regulator.
NOV 24, 2021

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. this week censured and fined a Los Angeles-based investment bank and broker-dealer, WestPark Capital Inc., $250,000 after it made material misrepresentations to clients in documents when selling promissory notes issued by its parent company.

WestPark is a small firm with 60 registered reps in eight branch offices, according to the Finra settlement, which was issued Monday. The firm is owned by WestPark Capital Financial Services, and the promissory notes in question were sold from January 2012 to January 2018 to 21 customers and raised $3.9 million, according to the regulator.

WestPark Capital agreed to the settlement without admitting or denying Finra's findings. Finra also fined the firm's CEO, Richard Rappaport, $30,000, and suspended him four months from the securities industry in the matter.

A WestPark Capital spokesperson did not return calls Wednesday morning to comment.

Small broker-dealers from time to time sell stock or try to raise money from sales of private placements or promissory notes. Regulators may keep a close eye on such dealings due to the opaque and closed nature of such transactions.

The firm's information in the sale of the notes was faulty, according to Finra. WestPark provided investors with offering documents for the notes, which were approved by Rappaport, that contained material misrepresentations and omitted material facts, according to Finra.

For example, the offering documents stated that the parent company had a $1 million line of credit with a bank and that it was not in default on any "agreement or instrument material to its business," according to Finra.

However, the offering documents failed to disclose that WestPark Capital Financial Services had defaulted on the line of credit and had defaulted on successive forbearance agreements with the bank, or that the bank had sued the firm and Rappaport.

The offering documents for the notes also failed to disclose the parent company had net operating losses each year from 2012 through 2016, according to Finra.

WestPark and Rappaport also failed to reasonably supervise the registered reps soliciting investments in the private notes, according to Finra, and also more recently to comply with Finra's Taping Rule, which requires firms to record and review conversations between reps and clients.

Latest News

Stock gain as trade, Fed optimism rises
Stock gain as trade, Fed optimism rises

US equity futures are up ahead of trade talks with China.

BofA's Hartnett says US stock rally is likely over
BofA's Hartnett says US stock rally is likely over

Strategist continues to favor bonds over stocks for 2025.

UBS could be about to sell its O’Connor hedge fund unit
UBS could be about to sell its O’Connor hedge fund unit

Talks are reportedly underway with Cantor.

President Trump looking at raising top tax rate in 'political death wish'
President Trump looking at raising top tax rate in 'political death wish'

New proposal could mean some would pay a total of more than half of what they earn.

Most people don’t expect to need long-term care in old age, but think others will
Most people don’t expect to need long-term care in old age, but think others will

Gaps revealed in knowledge about employer-sponsored caregiving programs.

SPONSORED The evolution of private credit

From direct lending to asset-based finance to commercial real estate debt.

SPONSORED Compliance in real time: Technology's expanding role in RIA oversight

RIAs face rising regulatory pressure in 2025. Forward-looking firms are responding with embedded technology, not more paperwork.