When it comes to controlling client assets, LPL Investment Holdings Inc.'s recent
IPO registration offers clear proof that the remaining four wirehouse broker-dealers still dwarf the more diverse galaxy of independent broker-dealers.
That stark difference appears to extend to income generation as well, though the 1,200 or so independent-contractor broker-dealers in the United States have had tremendous growth during the past decade.
According to information in the initial-public-offering registration, which LPL filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 4, there are about half as many wirehouse representatives (55,000) as independent reps (114,000).
Despite that, wirehouse reps control a far bigger pool of client assets than do independent reps. According to data in the registration supplied by industry consultant Cerulli Associates Inc., reps at wirehouses manage $3.95 trillion in total client assets, while independent reps oversee $1.8 trillion.
Thus, a wirehouse broker controls, on average, $71.8 million in assets. That number is closer to $16 million for independent reps.
The data supplied in the LPL registration also show a sizable gap in income between the two camps.
Typically, reps of both stripes generate about 1% in fees and commissions on client assets.
But wirehouse reps usually receive an average payout of 40% of those fees and commissions. Independent reps tend to get about 85%.
Based on those assumptions — and using the Cerulli data — the average wirehouse rep earns $287,200 annually, before taxes. The average independent adviser earns less than half of that — $134,300.
Of course, with 12,000 brokers and advisers, LPL has unusual heft for an independent broker-dealer. Not surprisingly, the company's management played up that point in the filing in an effort to convince investors that LPL can play with the big boys: Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC,
Bank of America Merrill Lynch,
UBS Financial Services Inc. and
Wells Fargo Advisors LLC.
In fact, LPL, which was acquired by two private-equity firms in 2005, stated in the registration that its payout to independent-contractor reps far outweighs that of the wirehouses, giving it a competitive advantage.
“Because of our scale and efficient operating model, we offer our advisers the highest average payout ratio among the five largest U.S. broker-dealers, ranked by number of advisers,” LPL noted.
But what isn't clear in the
IPO registration is the number of $1 million-plus producing brokers who wanted that high payout and joined LPL from wirehouses since 2005. The filing doesn't include information about LPL's hiring of wirehouse advisers.
One observer said that such information is crucial to understanding LPL's potential as a public company.
“What's the historical track record for LPL acquiring wirehouse guys?” asked Danny Sarch, an industry recruiter who in recent years has begun working with more independent-broker-dealer RIAs. “Has LPL been able to get to those brokers?”
LPL is in its quiet period. David Lilly, a spokesman for LPL, said the firm had no comment.
E-mail Bruce Kelly at [email protected].
