Morgan Stanley fined more than $10 million for violating customer protection rule

Morgan Stanley fined more than $10 million for violating customer protection rule
That rule is intended to safeguard clients' cash and securities so they can be promptly returned should the broker-dealer fail.
JAN 17, 2017
Morgan Stanley was fined and penalized more than $10 million Tuesday for trading errors involving customer cash and margin securities. The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that the firm had agreed to pay $7.5 million to settle charges it used trades involving customer cash to lower the firm's borrowing costs in violation of the SEC's customer protection rule. That rule is intended to safeguard clients' cash and securities so they can be promptly returned should the broker-dealer fail, according to the SEC. Meanwhile, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. said it fined Morgan Stanley $2.75 million for failing to have in place systems and policies to ensure it maintained possession and control of clients fully paid and excess margin securities. At times, Morgan Stanley mistakenly released certain customer shares it should have held in a separate account, and then the firm used those shares, according to the settlement. (More: Finra fines Morgan Stanley $1.5 million for failing to deliver fund prospectuses online) Fully paid securities are those held in cash accounts, according to Finra. The term excess margin securities refers to securities carried in a client's account having a market value in excess of 140% of the customer's net debit balance in that account. There was no retail customer involvement in the matters, which affected the firm's institutional clients. The firm neither admitted nor denied the findings of either settlement. “Morgan Stanley takes its obligations to protect customer assets very seriously, which is why the firm moved promptly to rectify the issues addressed in these settlements and enhanced our controls and procedures,” said spokesman Mark Lake. “In addition, the firm maintains substantially greater amounts than are required in its customer reserve account, so we do not believe that the firm's clients were at risk.'' From March 2013 to May 2015, Morgan Stanley's U.S. broker-dealer used transactions with an affiliate to reduce the amount it was required to deposit in its customer reserve account, according to the SEC's settlement. The transactions violated the customer protection rule, which prohibits broker-dealers from using affiliates to reduce their customer reserve account deposit requirements, according to the SEC. Morgan Stanley's system “contained a design flaw that allowed the firm to release certain securities from segregation that the system deemed to be in excess, when in fact no excess existed,” according to Finra. “The firm's release of those securities resulted in deficits in the customer securities it was required to segregate.”

Latest News

Private capital's $1 trillion bet on the American retirement account
Private capital's $1 trillion bet on the American retirement account

From 401(k)s to retail funds, Deloitte sees private equity and credit crossing into mainstream investing on two fronts at once.

Advisor moves: Wells Fargo Advisors pulls in $9.6b in fresh talent during first half of May
Advisor moves: Wells Fargo Advisors pulls in $9.6b in fresh talent during first half of May

Big-name defections from Morgan Stanley, UBS, and Merrill Lynch headline a busy two weeks of recruiting for the wirehouse.

Why uncertainty is making behavioral coaching more valuable than ever
Why uncertainty is making behavioral coaching more valuable than ever

Markets have always been unpredictable. What has changed is the amount of information investors are trying to process and the growing role advisors play in helping clients avoid emotional decisions

Florida investor hits real estate syndicator with fraud suit over $750K
Florida investor hits real estate syndicator with fraud suit over $750K

Six apartment deals, one "big account," and $2.7M in undocumented insider loans. Now the lawsuit lands

Chicago’s 'Mr. Finance' posed as advisor in loan scheme, according to Illinois regulators
Chicago’s 'Mr. Finance' posed as advisor in loan scheme, according to Illinois regulators

The Illinois order refers to Brandon Ellington’s investment program as a “Ponzi-like scheme.”

SPONSORED Are hedge funds the missing ingredient?

Wellington explores how multi strategy hedge funds may enhance diversification

SPONSORED Beyond wealth management: Why the future of advice is becoming more human

As technical expertise becomes increasingly commoditized, advisors who can integrate strategy, relationships, and specialized expertise into a cohesive client experience will define the next era of wealth management