Retroactive Social Security benefits: Everything you need to know

Retroactive Social Security benefits: Everything you need to know
Rules specify who qualifies for back benefits based on age and filing status.
AUG 20, 2018
A financial adviser contacted me recently to ask whether a widowed client, who had been eligible to collect Social Security survivor benefits at the earliest at age 60, could file for retroactive benefits now that she was 63. Any type of Social Security benefit claimed before full retirement age, whether as a retiree, spouse or survivor, is permanently reduced and subject to earnings restrictions if a claimant continues to work. But this client was a perfect candidate to claim reduced survivor benefits early since she was no longer working and therefore not subject to the earnings cap. She planned to delay collecting her own retirement benefits until 70 when they would be worth the maximum amount. Her financial adviser had recommended that she claim her survivor benefits at 60. Even though her survivor benefit would be worth just 71.5% of her late husband's primary insurance amount, compared to 100% if she waited until her full retirement age of 66, she could collect them for 10 years before switching to her own maximum retirement benefits at 70. However, she never got around to filing for Social Security and now wondered if she could collect back benefits. The short answer is no, but like anything else having to do with Social Security rules, there is a longer answer with lots of caveats. In general, only people who file for Social Security benefits after their full retirement age are entitled to back benefits, and the maximum retroactive payment is six months, beginning no sooner than full retirement age. So if someone claimed Social Security retirement benefits at 66 and four months, they could receive up to four months of back benefits in a lump sum instead of earning four months' worth of delayed retirement credits for claiming benefits after full retirement age. Or, if they claimed benefits at age 67 — a year after they reached full retirement age — they could collect six months' worth of back benefits — the maximum amount of retroactive benefits — in lieu of earning delayed retirement credits for that same period. Delayed retirement credits are worth 0.66% per month or 8% per year for every year that you postpone collecting benefits beyond full retirement age up to age 70. In most cases, electing to claim retroactive benefits in a lump sum permanently reduces ongoing monthly benefits. But sometimes it makes sense to claim retroactive benefits. For example, only a worker's retirement benefit earns delayed retirement credits when benefits are postponed beyond full retirement age. Spousal benefits and survivor benefits do not. They are worth the maximum amount when claimed at the spouse's or survivor's full retirement age. Therefore, someone who claims spousal or survivor benefits after their full retirement age should request the maximum six months of retroactive benefits (assuming they are at least 66 and 6 months old). There are some exceptions to the retroactivity rules in cases involving surviving spouses and eligible surviving ex-spouses who were married for at least 10 years before divorcing. Generally, the availability of retroactive benefits depends on whether the deceased worker claimed benefits before full retirement age. "Unless [her late husband] filed for his retirement benefits before his full retirement age, she will not be eligible for retroactive benefits," Jim Blair, a 35-year veteran of the Social Security Administration, said in response to my question about the widow's predicament. However, Social Security does allow limited retroactivity for widows and widowers who are under full retirement age in certain circumstances, said Mr. Blair, who is co-founder of the National Social Security Association, which offers a certification for financial professionals. For example, a widow or widower who is younger than full retirement age and who files for survivor benefits within one month of the worker's death can receive one month of retroactive benefits, starting with the month the worker died. That can be an important continuation of benefits for the surviving spouse since benefits paid to the worker during the month he or she died must be returned to Social Security. Also, a widow or widower who is over full retirement age may be entitled a larger survivor benefit than the deceased worker was collecting if he claimed before his full retirement age. Under the so-called widow’s/widower’s limit provision, a surviving spouse or surviving ex-spouse who is at least full retirement age would receive the larger of what the deceased worker was collecting at the time of his death or 82.5% of the deceased worker’s full retirement age benefit. Disabled widows and widowers, who are eligible to claim survivor benefits as early as age 50, can collect up to 12 months of retroactive survivor benefits if they claim survivor benefits before age 61.

Latest News

Slow is smooth, smooth is fast
Slow is smooth, smooth is fast

Chasing productivity is one thing, but when you're cutting corners, missing details, and making mistakes, it's time to take a step back.

Edward Jones layoffs about to hit employees, home office staff
Edward Jones layoffs about to hit employees, home office staff

It is not clear how many employees will be affected, but none of the private partnership’s 20,000 financial advisors will see their jobs at risk.

CFP Board hails record July exam turnout with 3,214 test-takers
CFP Board hails record July exam turnout with 3,214 test-takers

The historic summer sitting saw a roughly two-thirds pass rate, with most CFP hopefuls falling in the under-40 age group.

Founder of water vending machine company, portfolio manager, charged in $275M Ponzi scheme
Founder of water vending machine company, portfolio manager, charged in $275M Ponzi scheme

"The greed and deception of this Ponzi scheme has resulted in the same way they have throughout history," said Daniel Brubaker, U.S. Postal Inspection Service inspector in charge.

Advisor moves: Raymond James, Wells Fargo reel in billion dollar-plus advisor teams
Advisor moves: Raymond James, Wells Fargo reel in billion dollar-plus advisor teams

Elsewhere, an advisor formerly with a Commonwealth affiliate firm is launching her own independent practice with an Osaic OSJ.

SPONSORED Delivering family office services critical to advisor success

Stan Gregor, Chairman & CEO of Summit Financial Holdings, explores how RIAs can meet growing demand for family office-style services among mass affluent clients through tax-first planning, technology, and collaboration—positioning firms for long-term success

SPONSORED Passing on more than wealth: why purpose should be part of every estate plan

Chris Vizzi, Co-Founder & Partner of South Coast Investment Advisors, LLC, shares how 2025 estate tax changes—$13.99M per person—offer more than tax savings. Learn how to pass on purpose, values, and vision to unite generations and give wealth lasting meaning