What lurks in some foreign ETFs

The latest wrinkle in the world of exchange-traded funds is a fund that is a foreign company
JUN 09, 2011
The latest wrinkle in the world of exchange-traded funds is a fund that is a foreign company. The rush to silver, for example, spawned the creation of the Sprott Physical Silver Trust Ticker:(PSLV), which is a Canadian corporation. Because the trust is not engaged in an active business, it is considered a passive foreign investment company. By contrast, suppose an investor buys stock of a company such as Royal Dutch Shell PLC, the Anglo-Dutch oil company that conducts an active business. Any gains or losses in the shares will be taxed as if they came from a U.S. company. However, years ago, canny investors had the ability to start a corporation in a country with no taxation that would exist only to hold investments. Because the investments were held within a corporation in a tax haven, there was no tax on the portfolio's turnover or income. Eventually, when the shares were sold, the gain was treated as a long-term capital gain. The U.S. thought that result was too sweet a deal, so it closed the loophole by creating a new type of vehicle, the PFIC, which induces current taxation in the U.S. Under PFIC rules, a U.S. investor can make a qualifying electing fund election so that income received by the PFIC flows through to him or her. The offshore corporation would need to make yearly reports to the U.S. investor so that he or she could file a tax return properly. Since the U.S. also wanted to halt the conversion of ordinary income into long-term gains, investors in a PFIC that does not provide proper QEF reporting can defer the PFIC's income only at a steep cost: all income is converted to ordinary income and the U.S. charges a nondeductible interest charge on the taxes not previously paid. The Sprott ETF is a passive foreign investment corporation whose prospectus advises U.S. holders to make the QEF election. The “fund” will make the QEF information available so that any income will flow through to U.S. investors, just as income would from a U.S.-based fund. If the trust sells any silver, the gain or loss on that trade will flow through to investors. Short-term gains would be taxed at 35% and long-term gains would be taxed at 28% (the tax rate on collectible long-term gains). Sprott does not expect redemptions that might cause selling of the portfolio, and thus predicts little or no income flowing through each year to the shareholders. If an investor held the PFIC for more than a year and sold at a profit, he or she would be taxed at only 15% since the gain would be considered a long-term gain on a stock. If the investor does not make the QEF election, all profits will be turned into ordinary income and taxed at the highest rate — with an interest charge. I'm not sure why the fund could not face net redemptions. Presently, it is selling at a premium to its net asset value, which is baffling; why would anyone pay 15% extra to buy silver through an ETF when they can buy the same metal cheaper elsewhere? I would assume that this investor enthusiasm (or irrationality) could reverse itself as the bloom comes off the silver rose. As investors flock to sell, the trust's premium should evaporate. After that, as investors sell PSLV, market makers will purchase the fund in order to prevent it from going to a discount. Those market makers then redeem from the sponsor; the ETF then will have to sell silver and a taxable event will occur. The first precious-metal PFIC I'm aware of is the Central Fund of Canada Ticker:(CEF), which was founded in 1961. CEF also advises U.S. holders to make the QEF election, but it is a closed-end fund with a fixed number of shares, so there should be no net redemptions to the fund — which would mean no taxable income. With CEF trading at a smaller premium and possessing a more solid prognosis for favorable tax attributes, one wonders why the Sprott trust trades at a premium at all. Because there are no shares of PSLV to short, sanity will prevail only when investors turn negative on silver. Robert N. Gordon is chief executive of Twenty-First Securities Corp. and an adjunct professor at New York University's Leonard N. Stern School of Business. He can be reached at [email protected].

Latest News

The 2025 InvestmentNews Awards Excellence Awardees revealed
The 2025 InvestmentNews Awards Excellence Awardees revealed

From outstanding individuals to innovative organizations, find out who made the final shortlist for top honors at the IN awards, now in its second year.

Top RIA Cresset warns of 'inevitable' recession amid tariff uncertainty
Top RIA Cresset warns of 'inevitable' recession amid tariff uncertainty

Cresset's Susie Cranston is expecting an economic recession, but says her $65 billion RIA sees "great opportunity" to keep investing in a down market.

Edward Jones joins the crowd to sell more alternative investments
Edward Jones joins the crowd to sell more alternative investments

“There’s a big pull to alternative investments right now because of volatility of the stock market,” Kevin Gannon, CEO of Robert A. Stanger & Co., said.

Record RIA M&A activity marks strong start to 2025
Record RIA M&A activity marks strong start to 2025

Sellers shift focus: It's not about succession anymore.

IB+ Data Hub offers strategic edge for U.S. wealth advisors and RIAs advising business clients
IB+ Data Hub offers strategic edge for U.S. wealth advisors and RIAs advising business clients

Platform being adopted by independent-minded advisors who see insurance as a core pillar of their business.

SPONSORED Compliance in real time: Technology's expanding role in RIA oversight

RIAs face rising regulatory pressure in 2025. Forward-looking firms are responding with embedded technology, not more paperwork.

SPONSORED Advisory firms confront crossroads amid historic wealth transfer

As inheritances are set to reshape client portfolios and next-gen heirs demand digital-first experiences, firms are retooling their wealth tech stacks and succession models in real time.