Finra to try again on controversial membership rules

Ketchum letter says SRO responding to comments on first try

Feb 19, 2013 @ 3:27 pm

By Dan Jamieson

finra, ketchum
+ Zoom
((Photo: Lobstar)

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. is planning to reissue a package of controversial membership rules.

In an email sent to member firms Feb. 14, Finra chief executive Richard Ketchum said the board had approved issuing a revised proposal in response to comments on the previous one, which was floated in 2010.

The original proposal drew a sharp response from the brokerage industry, which said Finra's plan to require 30 days' notice for changes in a number of routine business activities was too far-reaching.

Among other things, Finra wanted advance notice of new products or services; expansion of personnel beyond certain limits; transactions that involved 10% or more of a firm's ownership, assets or revenue; and changes in a member's service providers.

After receiving advance notice, Finra could have required a formal approval process — known as a continuing-member application — and objected to any changes.

The proposal was designed to avoid fraud at both broker-dealers and their affiliates.

The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association and the Financial Services Institute Inc. urged Finra to revamp the rule and eliminate many of its requirements.

In its March 2010 comment letter, FSI said the proposal would “provide Finra with excessively broad authority to request documents and information from firms, impose vague standards of review and … extend Finra's jurisdiction well beyond its traditional bounds.”

In his email last week, Mr. Ketchum said the revised proposal would include provisions to address regulatory issues identified by Finra and to codify existing interpretations and practices.

Andrew DeSouza, a Sifma spokesman, and Finra spokeswoman Michelle Ong declined comment about Finra’s plan to reissue the rule.

In a statement, David Bellaire, FSI general counsel, noted that Mr. Ketchum’s email did not specify what will be included in the new proposal.

“We are hopeful that FINRA has addressed the issues we raised in our original comment letter,” Mr. Bellaire said.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

INTV

Wirehouse training programs are in vogue

At one time, major brokerage houses ran large, expensive training programs for thousands of young brokers, and now it looks as if they are about to return to that model.

Video Spotlight

Will It Last As Long As Your Clients Do?

Sponsored by Prudential

Video Spotlight

The Catalyst

Sponsored by Pershing

Latest news & opinion

Wealth management firms struggle with lower fees, fewer new clients

Advisers in North America earned less from clients last year and saw a decline in average fees, according to a new report by PriceMetrix.

These investors are allowed to put $500K into a Roth IRA at once

The HEART Act permits rolling all or part of life-insurance and combat-related-fatality payouts directly into the tax-free retirement plan, but few take advantage.

Labor's Alexander Acosta and SEC's Jay Clayton tell lawmakers they will work together on fiduciary rule

In separate appearances before Senate panels, the regulators stressed the cooperation that Republican legislators and opponents of the DOL fiduciary rule are demanding.

Brian Block denies cooking the books at Schorsch REIT

Former CFO claims everything he did was 'appropriate' and 'correct.'

Interns will take on several roles at advisory firms this summer

College students are helping with client prep, firm visioning and long-term projects, among other duties.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print