Mary Beth Franklin

Retirement 2.0blog

Mary Beth Franklin on what your clients really want when they talk about retirement.

Another reason to file and suspend Social Security benefits

There is flexibility in lump-sum payouts – but you must be alive to collect them

Jan 23, 2014 @ 9:57 am

By Mary Beth Franklin

+ Zoom

Thank goodness for Investment News readers who come up with such intriguing questions. By pushing the envelope on what I know about Social Security claiming rules, their queries sometimes send me scurrying to the Social Security Administration for answers and we all learn a little bit more as a result.

Just before Christmas, a reader wrote to me asking what would happen if he filed and suspended his Social Security benefits at his full retirement age of 66 and later decided he would like a partial lump-sum payout? Could he request one?

As regular readers of this column now know, it is possible to lift a voluntary suspension of retirement benefits and request a lump-sum payment of benefits back to the date of suspension.

This recently discovered use of the file and suspend strategy makes particular sense for single people who, unlike married couples, don't have to worry how their claiming decision might affect spousal or survivor benefits.

For single people especially, the file and suspend strategy can be used as an insurance policy.

The premise is to file for benefits at full retirement age, currently 66, and then immediately suspend benefits with the intention of earning delayed retirement credits worth 8% per year for every year they postpone collecting benefits beyond full retirement age, up to 70.

But anyone who files and suspends benefits can change their minds and request a lump-sum payout back to the date of the original suspension. Of course, if they did, they would forfeit the delayed retirement credits earned during that period.

Why would you want to file and suspend and then request a lump sum?

Let's say you're single and had expected to live a long time, and at 68 receive a terminal diagnosis. Longevity is suddenly the least of your worries and a lump sum payout might come in handy. Going forward, you would collect Social Security benefits based on your age when you suspended benefits, not larger benefits based on your current, older age.

Married beneficiaries may also file and suspend, but probably would be more concerned about maximizing their retirement benefits and subsequent survivor benefits by accruing delayed retirement credits rather than requesting a lump sum payout.

But what about receiving a partial lump sum benefit?

“What if you file and suspend at full retirement age and then three years later wish you had a lump sum? Can you request a partial payout?” the reader asked in an e-mail. “Maybe just a year's worth? “

Frankly, I didn't know the answer, so I asked my contacts at the Social Security national press office in Baltimore.

Sure enough, they knew the answer.

“Yes, the individual who initiated the suspension may request at any time to have benefits reinstated effective for any month of the suspension period,” SSA spokesperson Kia Anderson confirmed in an e-mail. “Therefore, [he or she] may request to have a partial period of the suspension period reinstated and receive a lump sum payment representative for that period.”

Another reader asked if it were possible for the estate of someone who filed and suspended, but who died before collecting Social Security retirement benefits, to claim the uncollected benefits in a lump sum.

I replied no, but added that a surviving spouse, depending on age and circumstances, could claim survivor benefits on the deceased worker's record. But I thought I'd double check with SSA just in case.

Ms. Anderson confirmed my response.

“If the individual dies during the period of voluntary suspension and a survivor requests that benefits for months prior to the death be reinstated and paid as an underpayment to the estate, we will not reinstate the benefits,” Ms. Anderson said. “Generally, only the person who requested the voluntary suspension may request reinstatement.”

So there you have it. If you file and suspend benefits, you have the right to request a full or partial lump-sum payment during the suspension period, but you would forfeit any delayed retirement credits earned during that same period.

And only you can request a lump-sum payout. If you die before collecting benefits, your widow or widower would be eligible for survivor benefits based on what you would have received at time of death, but not a lump sum payout of uncollected benefits.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

RIA Data Center

Use InvestmentNews' RIA Data Center to filter and find key information on over 1,400 fee-only registered investment advisory firms.

Rank RIAs by

Upcoming Event

Aug 01


An Adviser's Guide to Developing NextGen Talent

As the registered investment advisory business matures, it's clear we need to focus on a new generation of talent.Research from InvestmentNews shows that firms of seven or more full-time individuals employing at least one NextGen... Learn more

Featured video


Pershing's Dolly: Lessons in leadership

Women are holding top leadership roles as CEOs of some of the industry’s top firms, but it’s still the exception rather than the norm. Lisa Dolly of Pershing talks about how to balance it all.

Latest news & opinion

More advisers disapprove of Trump job performance at six-month mark

More than half of respondents to InvestmentNews poll say their confidence has dropped since start of term. Supporters give him partial credit for market uptick.

Fidelity taps Goldman Sachs to expand lending services through RIAs

Streamlined non-purpose loans use investment portfolios as collateral.

Jay Clayton says SEC, DOL can give market 'clarity' on fiduciary rule

Chief regulator is confident two agencies could reach 'common ground' on an investment advice standard across all accounts.

Vanguard winning at bond inflows, too

But iShares is strong competition.

Sen. Gary Peters brings broker background to work every day on Capitol Hill

Michigan Democrat resists ripping up DOL fiduciary rule but would be open to some changes.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print