Fiduciary duty bill could kill DOL rule

Assistant Labor chief Borzi says bill won't slow her efforts

Jun 18, 2013 @ 4:20 pm

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

The House Financial Services Committee is scheduled to vote Wednesday on legislation that would require the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Labor Department to coordinate their efforts to strengthen investment-advice rules. But some observers say coordination is likely to mean the end of the DOL's efforts.

“This bill clearly would delay the DOL from moving ahead in the near term with fiduciary rule making under [federal retirement law],” said Neil Simon, vice president of government relations at the Investment Adviser Association.

In fact, it could stop it altogether.

“Consider a scenario in which the SEC decided not to promulgate a rule,” said Marilyn Mohrman-Gillis, director of public policy and communications, at the Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards Inc. “It could prevent the Department of Labor from engaging in rule making.”

The bill was introduced in May by Rep. Ann Wagner, R-Mo., as a discussion draft. In converting the measure to formal legislation, Ms. Wagner sharpened language pertaining to the SEC's and DOL's work on separate fiduciary-duty rules.

Under Ms. Wagner's bill, the Labor Department would be prohibited from proposing a rule that would expand the definition of “fiduciary” as it applies to anyone providing investment advice to retirement plans such as 401(k)s until 60 days after the SEC proposes a separate uniform fiduciary duty rule for retail investment advice.

That won't stop Assistant Labor Secretary Phyllis Borzi, who has been the driving force behind the DOL fiduciary rule.

While Ms. Borzi declined to comment specifically on Ms. Wagner's bill, she told reporters on the sidelines of an Insured Retirement Institute conference in Washington Tuesday that DOL will forge ahead with its rule, which she sees as important for protecting workers from conflicted advice about retirement plans that many now have to manage on their own.

She noted that the DOL is working independently of the SEC.

“Of course not,” she said when asked if DOL would wait on the SEC. “We're coordinating very closely with the SEC to make sure we don't have outright conflicts.”

The DOL is expected to re-propose its rule in the next couple months. The SEC is not nearly as far along. It is collecting information to conduct a cost-benefit analysis that would help the agency determine whether to propose its own fiduciary-duty rule.

Unlike the discussion draft, Ms. Wagner's formal bill specifically mentions the DOL and outlines a timetable. The bill also has been submitted to the House Education and Workforce Committee, which has jurisdiction over the Labor Department.

The DOL first issued its fiduciary proposal in 2010. It was withdrawn after fierce financial industry protest against provisions that would have for the first time subjected brokers selling individual retirement accounts to the more stringent fiduciary requirements.

Opponents of the DOL fiduciary rule have warned that the rule and the SEC fiduciary rule for investment advice could overlap, causing compliance difficulties for brokers. The DOL proposal has drawn bipartisan opposition on Capitol Hill.

Ms. Wagner's bill also addresses the SEC's potential rule. It would require that the agency determine whether investors are currently being harmed by the differing advice standards that advisers and brokers meet and assess whether a uniform standard would limit investor access to advice. Under current law, advisers must act in the best interest of their clients, while brokers meet a less stringent suitability standard when selling investment products.

Unlike the discussion draft, the formal bill does not require the SEC to harmonize broker-dealer and adviser regulations on registration, supervision and examination before advancing a uniform standard.

That development pleased adviser advocates, who see “harmonization” as a code word for halting a uniform standard.

“It is nowhere near as threatening as the provision that was in the discussion draft,” Mr. Simon said.

The House financial committee is likely to approve the bill, which would send it to the House floor for a vote by the full chamber.

Even though its prospects in the Senate appear poor, parts of the bill -- including the harmonization requirement -- could wind up in other proposals. What's more, the measure might send a very skeptical signal to the SEC and DOL about their fiduciary rules.

“It could make the agencies that much more cautious in the manner in which they proceed,” Mr. Simon said.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Upcoming Event

May 16


Chicago Women Adviser Summit

The InvestmentNews Women Adviser Summit, a one-day workshop now held in six cities due to popular demand, is uniquely designed for the sophisticated female adviser who wants to take her personal and professional self to the next level.... Learn more

Featured video


How are broker-dealers helping 401(k) advisers adapt to a changing market?

Bryan Hodgens, co-head of LPL Financial's Retirement Partners group, says the industry is getting much better at connecting advisers to wealth management opportunities and helping scale their businesses.

Latest news & opinion

Social Security funding outlook improves slightly

Retirement reserves extended one year; disability fund by 20 years

IBD report: Another impressive year

Despite a stock market decline, revenue is up. And the streak isn't expected to end anytime soon.

IBDs with the most CFPs

How many of the more than 83,000 certified financial planners are employed by the big independent broker-dealers?

Richard Thaler wants to use 401(k)s to boost Social Security payments

The Nobel laureate wants to simplify drawing down retirement assets, which he thinks is 'way harder' than saving the money.

InvestmentNews announces 2019 Innovation Awards winners

Sheryl Garrett is this year's InvestmentNews Icon.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print