Subscribe

Just 16% of workers confident about retirement income

Workers are more confident about having enough income to pay for their basic expenses in retirement, but they are behind on savings and investments, according to a recent study.

Workers are more confident about having enough income to pay for their basic expenses in retirement, but they are behind on savings and investments, according to a recent study.

In a survey conducted by the Employee Benefit Research Institute, just 16% of polled workers said that they are “very confident” about their retirement income. That is about the same response that EBRI got when it ran a similar survey last year.

Also of note: A mere 19% of the polled retirees said that they are “very” confident about having sufficient money to live comfortably through their retirement years.

Nearly 40% of the retirees say that they aren’t confident about having enough money, which is up from 32% last year and 34% in 2008.

The participants’ sentiments appear to be in tune with the market, said Craig Copeland, EBRI senior research associate.

“The stock market has improved, unemployment has leveled off, and you see a little bit of growth in the economy,” he said. “It’s not so much that they don’t feel better; rather, they don’t feel worse, and that has a lot to do with the economy.”

Although workers’ attitudes on having enough money to get by appeared to have held steady since last year, their finances don’t seem to be getting any better.

Fewer of them are saving, for instance. Just 69% of the polled workers said they and/or their spouses had saved for retirement in 2010, down from 75% last year.

Nearly 30% of all respondents said that they haven’t saved any money for retirement, citing that they couldn’t afford to save. Workers and retirees also pointed to numerous other reasons, including the misconception that they had plenty of time to save, having other priorities and being ignorant and uninformed about retirement planning.

“A lot of people didn’t have increases in their salary, so they had to dip into their savings, or they were unable to add to their savings, because they could only cover their expenses,” Mr. Copeland said. He added that historically, about a fifth of the participants have had essentially nothing saved up, a function of those individuals’ persistently being low earners.

Among the 902 workers surveyed, 54% said that the total value of their household savings and investments — exclusive of their primary home and defined-benefit plans — is less than $25,000. Another 27% said that they had less than $1,000, up from 20% in last year.

Just 11% of those polled said they had at least $250,000 in household savings.

Despite coming up woefully short in the way of savings, just 46% of the workers have actually calculated how much they need to scrimp in order to have a comfortable retirement.

EBRI conducted phone interviews in January with 902 individuals over 25, including 251 retirees. The survey was performed in conjunction with Mathew Greenwald and Associates Inc.

E-mail Darla Mercado at [email protected].

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Stuck in the middle

Newly elected Finra board member whose firm is connected to a bribery scandal says the matter should have no effect on his ability to serve.

Fighting for market share in the LTC business

A handful of publicly held life insurers dominate the market for traditional long-term-care insurance, but mutual life insurers are beginning to make inroads with agents and financial advisers.

Breaking up is hard to do – especially with annuities

When a client came to his office bearing her new divorce decree, adviser Dale Russell became the bearer…

Longevity insurance promising – but higher rates would help

The Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service like it, as do many estate-planning experts. Now all…

Long-term care: Cutting back coverage

When a 74-year-old client visited Ellen R. Siegel six years ago with news of an upcoming 12% rate increase on the premium of her long-term-care insurance, the adviser knew she had to navigate the potential benefit cuts with the precision of a surgeon.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print