Tax strategy patents may be headed for ash heap

Senate's near-unanimous passage of law prohibiting such patents hailed as ‘big step forward for taxpayers'; on to the House

Mar 9, 2011 @ 3:02 pm

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

Now that the Senate has approved a ban on patents for tax strategies — a first — proponents are turning their focus to the House.

The Senate last night overwhelmingly passed, 95-5, a bill that includes a provision that prohibits individuals or firms from trade-marking a particular way of paying taxes or achieving an exemption.

The prospects for the bill are unclear in the House, which is just beginning to draft a similar measure. But the Senate vote “is a big step forward for taxpayers,” said Phillips Hinch, assistant director of government relations at the Financial Planning Association. “We'll be lobbying the House to make sure that provision gets into the House bill as well. They're still in the discussion phase.”

Under current law, financial planners must be aware of the various patents that are in force in the welter of U.S. tax rules. For instance, there is a patent on how to put stock options into a grantor retained annuity trust. If a planner wanted to recommend such a strategy, he or she would have to get permission — or risk litigation.

The situation hinders the creation of tax plans, according to the FPA.

“The tax code should be a document for everyone to use,” Mr. Hinch said.

Prohibiting tax strategies drew bipartisan support in the Senate.

“Taxes are a responsibility we share, and tax strategies should not be hijacked and monopolized for profit,” Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, said in a statement.

Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa, the ranking Republican on the committee, said that tax strategy patents are increasing.

“More and more legal tax strategies are unavailable or more expensive for more and more taxpayers,” Mr. Grassley said in a statement. “It's important to protect intellectual property rights for true tax preparation and financial management software. At the same time, we have to protect the right of taxpayers to have equal access to legal tax strategies. That's necessary for fairness and tax compliance.”

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

Events

Crossmark's Rentfrow: Why should advisors care about responsible investing?

There are lot of misconceptions when it comes to socially responsible investing. Crossmark's David Rentfrow debunks the myths and discusses opportunities for advisers.

Latest news & opinion

Raymond James executives call on industry to keep broker protocol

Also ask firms to pay for the administration of the protocol to 'ensure its longevity and relevance.'

House passes tax bill, focus turns to Senate

Tax reform legislation expected to have more of a challenge in upper chamber.

SEC enforcement of advisers drops in Trump era

The agency pursued 82 cases against advisers and firms in fiscal year 2017, down from 98 the previous year.

PIABA accuses Finra of conflicts of interest

Public Investors Arbitration Bar Association report slams self-regulator over its picks for board of governors.

Betterment launches 'free' charitable-giving platform

Robo-software provider lets investors donate directly from their accounts, and will not charge charities with less than $1 million on the platform.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print