Subscribe

Tax strategy patents may be headed for ash heap

Now that the Senate has approved a ban on patents for tax strategies, proponents are turning their focus to the House

Now that the Senate has approved a ban on patents for tax strategies, proponents are turning their focus to the House.

The Senate last Tuesday overwhelmingly passed, 95-5, a bill that includes a provision that prohibits individuals or firms from trade-marking a particular way of paying taxes or achieving an exemption.

The prospects for the bill are unclear in the House, which is just beginning to draft a similar measure. But the Senate vote “is a big step forward for taxpayers,” said Phillips Hinch, assistant director of government relations at the Financial Planning Association.

“We’ll be lobbying the House to make sure that provision gets into the House bill, as well. They’re still in the discussion phase,” Mr. Hinch said.

Under current law, financial planners must be aware of the various patents that are in force in the welter of U.S. tax rules.

For instance, there is a patent on how to put stock options into a grantor-retained annuity trust. If a planner wanted to recommend such a strategy, he or she would have to get permission — or risk litigation.

The situation hinders the creation of tax plans, according to the FPA.

“The tax code should be a document for everyone to use,” Mr. Hinch said.

Prohibiting tax strategy patents drew bipartisan support in the Senate.

“Taxes are a responsibility we share, and tax strategies should not be hijacked and monopolized for profit,” Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, said in a statement.

Tax strategy patents are increasing, said Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa, the ranking Republican on the committee. “More and more legal tax strategies are unavailable or more expensive for more and more taxpayers,” Mr. Grassley said in a statement.

“It’s important to protect intellectual-property rights for true tax preparation and financial management software. At the same time, we have to protect the right of taxpayers to have equal access to legal tax strategies. That’s necessary for fairness and tax compliance.”

E-mail Mark Schoeff Jr. at [email protected].

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Wealth firms must prepare for demise of non-competes, despite legal challenges to FTC rule

A growing sentiment against restricting employee moves could affect non-solicitation, too.

FPA, CFP Board diverge on DOL investment advice proposal

While the CFP Board supports the proposal, the FPA has expressed concerns about the DOL rule potentially raising compliance costs for members, increasing the cost of advice and reducing access to advice for some.

Braxton encourages RIAs to see investing in diversity as a business strategy

‘If a firm values its human capital, then it will make an investment to make sure that their talent can flourish for the advancement of the bottom line,’ says Lazetta Rainey Braxton, co-CEO of 2050 Wealth Partners.

Bill chips away at SALT block but comes with drawbacks, advisors say

'I’d love to see the [full] SALT deduction come back but not if it means rates go up,' one advisor says.

Former Morgan Stanley broker running for office reviewing $147K award

Deborah Adeimy claimed firm blocked her from running in GOP primary, aide says 'we're unclear how award figure was calculated.'

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print