Critics slam Finra panel ban plan

Say proposal to bar its former execs from representing clients in disciplinary cases won't improve enforcement; possible ‘undue influence' seen as mostly a perception problem

Jul 12, 2011 @ 4:14 pm

By Dan Jamieson

Former officers of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. would be banned from representing industry clients in Finra disciplinary cases under a proposal the self-regulatory organization filed last Friday. But critics of the plan, aimed at ending any perception of a “revolving door” between the industry and the regulator, are unimpressed.

The rule would restrict former Finra vice presidents, senior vice presidents and higher ranking executives who are also attorneys from appearing on behalf of clients before Finra hearing officers, hearing panels, the National Adjudicatory Council and the Finra board.

The proposal would safeguard “against former Finra officers' potentially exerting undue influence in Finra proceedings,” Finra said in its rule filing.

The prohibition would also ban former Finra officers from appearing on behalf of a witness or acting as an expert witness for a respondent.

“It's a reasonable restriction to prevent the appearance of a 'revolving door' between Finra and the people it is supposed to regulate,” said Hardy Callcott, a partner at Bingham McCutchen LLP, and a former assistant general counsel at the Securities and Exchange Commission.

“The SEC has long had a rule that certain senior officials couldn't appear before the SEC in any capacity” for a year after leaving the SEC, Mr. Callcott said.

“I don't believe that officers who've left Finra and represented clients on the other side have exerted any type of undue influence,” said Joel Beck, founder of The Beck Law Firm LLC, and a former Finra enforcement attorney.

“But certainly in some instances, it creates a public perception on some fronts” that former big-name regulators can receive better treatment, he said.

The proposal wouldn't affect the majority of the lawyers who work for Finra, Mr. Beck added.

Some don't see the need for a prohibition.

“The missed opportunities by Finra and the SEC to address various major financial disasters or get the bad guys has nothing to do with former Finra or SEC officers getting jobs in the private sector,” said Sylvia Scott, a partner at Freeman Freeman & Smiley LLP, and a former Finra and SEC enforcement lawyer.

She said the proposal does not “address the fairness or effectiveness of the enforcement process,” which she contends spends too much time on inconsequential matters.

In addition, there is nothing magic about a one-year prohibition, said Alan Wolper, a partner at Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP, also a former Finra lawyer.

After 366 days, the supposed 'perception of fairness' suddenly springs into existence?" he said.

"The one-year time period we now have in place mirrors other financial regulators with similar prohibitions," said Finra spokeswoman Nancy Condon in an email.

Even if they sit out for a year, former top enforcement officials won't lose their effectiveness in defending clients, Mr. Beck said.

"They don't lose their understanding of what happens [in a case], how the process works, and the rules and the regulations," he said. "They would just be a bit more removed" from their former posts.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video


The #MeToo movement and the financial advice industry

Attendees at the Women to Watch luncheon commend the #MeToo movement for raising awareness about the issue of sexual harassment and bringing women together.

Latest news & opinion

What the next market downturn means for small RIAs

Firms that have enjoyed AUM growth because of the runup in stocks may find it hard to adjust to declining revenues if the market suffers a major correction.

DOL fiduciary rule: Industry reacts to Fifth Circuit ruling

Groups on both sides of the fiduciary debate had plenty to say.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals vacates DOL fiduciary rule

In split decision, judges say agency exceeded authority.

UBS, after dumping the broker protocol, continues to see brokers come and go

The wirehouse has seen 14 individuals or teams leave and five join for a net loss of $2.4 billion in AUM

Merrill vets ready to recharge breakaway recruiting efforts

After regrouping in wake of broker-protocol exits, Snowden Lane Partners is ready to recruit wirehouse brokers and RIAs.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print