Subscribe

Agent in church insurance flap: Parishioners were told to lie to Aviva

Aviva Life & Annuity Co. this month amended its lawsuit against six insurance agents in an alleged charity-owned life insurance scheme, claiming that the parishioners of a Los Angeles church were coached to lie to the insurer about the source of premiums for their coverage

Aviva Life & Annuity Co. this month amended its lawsuit against six insurance agents in an alleged charity-owned life insurance scheme, claiming that the parishioners of a Los Angeles church were coached to lie to the insurer about the source of premiums for their coverage.

The amended suit, filed Aug. 11 in the U.S. District Court in the Central District of California, is the latest chapter in litigation that dates back to March against a group of life agents, including Candice H. Hobdy, Kazimir Patelski and Rene Williams. DesignLife Insurance Services LLC, Mr. Patelski’s insurance general agency, and Wilshire Coast Consultants, a trustee over 119 of the policies, also are named in the suit.

The updated lawsuit by Aviva includes elements from a July deposition of two of the agents.

Ms. Williams provided Aviva’s attorneys with documents indicating that a quarter of the parishioners’ death benefits would go to the church, a quarter would go to Citadel Urban Development Foundation Inc. — a nonprofit group that caters to inner-city churches — and the remaining 50% would go to the church members’ beneficiaries.

According to her testimony, DesignLife set up temporary bank accounts at Wells Fargo for the parishioners, while Citadel “gifted” the premium funds into the accounts. Churchgoers were told that they were technically paying for the policies, as the bank accounts were in their names, according to the deposition.

STAY ON SCRIPT

But another document from Ms. Williams — a script allegedly created by DesignLife for the agents — instructed parishioners on what to say if Aviva called them to verify the information on their applications.

“They may ask you, “who is paying for your policy’, and like we stated in our presentation, we made it very clear that “you are,’” the script says. “If your answer is not responded to in this way, they will think something “fishy’ is going on.”

In the amended litigation, Aviva also added defendants Richard C. Huitt, who allegedly solicited churchgoers for the coverage, and Citadel, which Aviva claims provided funds to cover the premiums in return for its 25% cut of the parishioners’ death benefit proceeds. He is Citadel’s vice president of memberships.

$2.1 MILLION SUIT

Aviva also added a dozen more individuals to its list of insured individuals in the scheme, bringing the total to 131. The insurer is seeking $2.1 million in the suit.

Mr. Huitt declined to comment on the suit.

Sue Park, an attorney for Mr. Patelski, Wilshire Coast, DesignLife and three other agents named in the suit, didn’t return a call seeking comment.

Initially, Aviva claimed that the parishioners were solicited at church for an “endowment program,” which involved taking out a policy on a church member and dividing the death benefits between that person’s beneficiaries, the church and an unknown third party. But Aviva said that questions about the policies arose after some parishioners contacted the insurer stating that they never paid premiums on their policies or that they paid the initial premiums, with another entity making subsequent payments.

Two churchgoers contacted by InvestmentNews in April claimed that the program was offered as a way to help their church.

NO CLAIMS YET

Aviva spokesman Kevin Waetke reiterated the insurer’s earlier statement: “We are fortunate this issue was discovered early before any claims were made on any of the policies. In conjunction with the litigation, we will work closely with each family to evaluate their individual circumstances to provide them with coverage, if appropriate and desired.”

Ms. Hobdy and Ms. Williams in their testimony claimed that they were paid $100 for every policy that they delivered. Commissions for the sale of each policy were as high as $10,000, and the women received just a sliver of the amount, said their attorney, Okorie Okorocha.

“There wasn’t a single commission check that went to those girls,” Mr. Okorocha said. “The thousands of dollars went to the ones running the scam; these women with young kids wouldn’t risk federal prison over a couple hundred dollars.”

The agents aided people in filling out their insurance applications, according to the deposition.

“There were a few that I had to fill out the whole application for them cause they could not read and write very well,” Ms. Hobdy said in her testimony. “So I’d just sit there and ask all the questions and fill it out for them.”

Email Darla Mercado at [email protected]

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Stuck in the middle

Newly elected Finra board member whose firm is connected to a bribery scandal says the matter should have no effect on his ability to serve.

Fighting for market share in the LTC business

A handful of publicly held life insurers dominate the market for traditional long-term-care insurance, but mutual life insurers are beginning to make inroads with agents and financial advisers.

Breaking up is hard to do – especially with annuities

When a client came to his office bearing her new divorce decree, adviser Dale Russell became the bearer…

Longevity insurance promising – but higher rates would help

The Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service like it, as do many estate-planning experts. Now all…

Long-term care: Cutting back coverage

When a 74-year-old client visited Ellen R. Siegel six years ago with news of an upcoming 12% rate increase on the premium of her long-term-care insurance, the adviser knew she had to navigate the potential benefit cuts with the precision of a surgeon.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print