SEC member Gallagher calls for review of SROs

Says keeping an ‘open mind’ about shifting oversight of advisers to Finra

Oct 4, 2012 @ 3:07 pm

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

A member of the Securities and Exchange Commission today called for a review of self-regulation of financial companies but said he is keeping an open mind about shifting oversight of investment advisers from the SEC to an industry group.

In a speech in New York, SEC member Daniel Gallagher said that SROs such as the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. that regulate brokers have been “operating within a framework that we have not analyzed in depth for almost 20 years and no longer accurately reflects the state of today's markets.”

Finra's role in particular should be reassessed, according to Mr. Gallagher.

In a follow-up interview, however, he added that his speech was meant as a catalyst for a discussion about SROs rather than a critique of Finra.

A bill was introduced in the House this year that would authorize one or more adviser SROs. Finra is the strongest proponent of the measure and is seeking to become the adviser regulator.

That legislation is effectively dead for the year.

Mr. Gallagher suggested that Finra has its hands full regulating brokers.

“With all of the issues facing the broker-dealer industry it was created to oversee, should Finra be seeking to branch out into entirely new fields of responsibility, such as regulating investment advisers?” he said, according to the prepared text of his speech at the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association's Market Structure Conference. “Is 'mission creep' affecting Finra's ability to perform its core duties?”

In the interview, Mr. Gallagher said he has not formulated a view about whether advisers should be regulated by an SRO.

“My mind is totally open on these issues,” said Mr. Gallagher, a Republican commissioner. “If there is going to be an SRO regime for advisers, I don't want to be seen as saying Finra shouldn't be doing it.”

The SRO bill was written by House Financial Services Committee Chairman Spencer Bachus, R-Ala. He wasn't able to bring the legislation to a committee vote, in part because of resistance from fellow his GOP colleagues.

Finra declined to comment.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Featured video

INTV

Advisers beware: tax law has unintended consequences

Commission accounts could be preferable for some clients, and advisers could be incentivized to move from employee broker-dealers to independent channels.

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

Relying on trainees, Merrill Lynch boosts adviser headcount in 2017

Questions remain about long-term effectiveness of wirehouse's move away from recruiting experienced brokers.

Supreme Court review of SEC judges could roil pending cases

But long-term, the agency may get around questions of constitutionality by changing the way it brings on administrative law judges.

Lightyear Capital takes 50% stake in $9 billion HPM Partners

Private equity backing could fuel acquisitions by the large RIA.

Tax reform: 7 essential strategies for financial advisers

While advisers face the difficult task of analyzing the law's impact, they will also have a significant opportunity to prove their value by implementing money-saving strategies for clients as well as their own businesses.

Tax law: Everything advisers need to know about the pass-through provision

The provision is tricky, but could provide advisers and business-owner clients with sizable tax savings.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print