AIG lawsuit decision a boost for its reps

Avoiding a second black eye, insurer's board says it will not join action against U.S. government

Jan 9, 2013 @ 4:02 pm

By Bruce Kelly

AIG, bailout, insurance
+ Zoom

A decision by the board of directors at American International Group Inc. not to sue the U.S. government for allegedly giving short shrift to the giant insurer in its 2008 bailout is good news for its network of independent broker-dealers.

The insurer issued a statement today stating that it will not join a $25 billion investor suit led by Starr International Group Inc. and former AIG chief executive Maurice “Hank” Greenberg. According to lawsuit, the federal government deprived investors of tens of billions of dollars because of the allegedly sweet deal the Fed concocted when it purchased an 80% stake in the company for $182 billion.

Starr International had demanded that AIG join the suit.

“In considering and ultimately refusing the demand before us, the board of directors properly and fully executed our fiduciary and legal obligations to AIG and its shareholders,” Robert S. “Steve” Miller, chairman of the AIG board, said in the statement. “America invested in 62,000 AIG employees, and we kept our promise to rebuild this great company, repay every dollar America invested in us and deliver a profit to those who put their trust in us.”

A little more than a week ago, AIG launched a media blitz with the tagline “Thank you, America.” Turning around and suing the U.S. government would have severely undercut that message. What's more, joining the suit would have dramatically undermined the recent hard work and diligence by AIG's independent-broker-dealer network of 7,000 registered representatives and investment advisers to stabilize and rebuild since the painfully embarrassing and costly bailout.

Now simply called Advisor Group, this is the same network of broker-dealers that used to operate under the umbrella of AIG Advisor Group. Public anger over the Fed's role in propping up the insurer led to the decision to lop off the AIG name from the broker-dealers' brand. That name change coincided with the wholesale re-branding of one of its broker-dealers in 2009, SagePoint Financial Inc., which used to be called AIG Financial Advisors Inc.

Before the bailout, Advisor Group CEO Larry Roth regularly touted AIG's fortress of a balance sheet as a reason why reps should flock to the AIG broker-dealers. But the company's brand took a huge hit when management, in September 2008, indicated that the insurer was about to collapse.

The massive meltdown left broker-dealers despondent and shattered, particularly the renamed SagePoint. About a quarter of that firm's brokers left in 2009, with at least another 5% leaving in 2010. The firm has recently gained ground and now has about 1,800 reps and advisers.

“The AIG broker-dealers have done a very good job to improve their brands since 2008, all the while distancing themselves from” the parent company, said Larry Papike, president of third-party recruiting firm Cross-Search.

An AIG lawsuit against the federal government would have been “the last thing anybody at the AIG broker-dealers wanted,” he said. “This has been universally panned [by staff] as, 'Oh, no, not now!'”

Others agree.

“For AIG to insert itself into this discussion, just at a time when the company finally started to emerge from being the most vilified company in the world, was simply inexplicable,” said Larry Taunt, who left AIG's SagePoint in 2010 to join another broker-dealer.

“I don't know how much was spent on the recent Thank You ad campaign, but they might as well have burned that money" if AIG had gone through with the suit, said Mr. Taunt, chief investment officer and chairman emeritus of Regal Financial Group, who spoke before AIG made its announcement today.

AIG spokeswoman Linda Malamut noted that under applicable law, as well as according to certain court rulings, the AIG board had to consider and respond to Starr's demand.

The four firms SagePoint, FSC Securities Corp., Royal Alliance Associates Inc. and the recently acquired Woodbury Financial Services Inc. are on track to produce about $1.2 billion in total revenue for 2012. That compares with roughly $39 billion for the entire company.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

Apr 30


Retirement Income Summit

Join InvestmentNews at the 12th annual Retirement Income Summit - the industry's premier retirement planning conference.Much has changed - and much remains to be learned. Attend and discuss how the future is full of opportunity for ... Learn more

Featured video


Albridge's Butler: Making advisers of tomorrow more effective and efficient

Gadget Girl checks out the latest tech from Albridge and how they're helping advisers stay one step ahead of the curve.

Video Spotlight

Will It Last As Long As Your Clients Do?

Sponsored by Prudential

Video Spotlight

The Catalyst

Sponsored by Pershing

Latest news & opinion

10 funds with largest 3-year outflows

Even well-managed funds that have beaten the S&P 500’s 10.1% average annual gain have watched investors flee.

Wirehouse training programs are back

At one time, major brokerage houses ran large, expensive training programs for thousands of young brokers, and now it looks as if they are about to return to that model.

New military pension rules need financial advisers to step up and serve

Matching defined contribution plan expected to see more money, more need for sound advice.

Brian Block's $4 million bonus was tied to a key metric at ARCP

Prosecution rests case in fraud trial against CFO of American Realty Capital Properties.

Edward Jones is winning the Google search war

Brokerage firm's digital marketing investment helps land it at the top of local and overall search engine results, report finds.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print