Morgan Stanley fights Idaho defecting brokers

Judge denies most claims; next stop is Finra arbitration

May 30, 2013 @ 4:11 pm

By Andrew Osterland

When is a successful recruiting effort actually a competitive raid?

Morgan Stanley will test that question in arbitration with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc., now that an Idaho federal court judge has denied most of its requests for a restraining order against three former brokers.

On May 17, the company filed a complaint against three former Smith Barney brokers in its Coeur D'Alene, Idaho. branch who left to join Stifel Nicolaus & Co.

Donald Scharenberg, Guy Gerber and Michael Armon, the producing branch manager for the office, signed on with Stifel on May 9. In its filing with the court, Morgan Stanley said the three men managed a total of $229 million in assets and produced $1.7 million in revenue between them, which represented more than half the assets managed and revenue generated by the Coeur D'Alene office.

“The Coeur d'Alene MSSB branch is relatively small, with only six financial advisors at the time defendants were still employed there. The departure of three financial advisors, including the branch manager (defendant Armon) has led the relatively small office to experience upset, anxiety, insecurity, uneasiness and concern,” Morgan Stanley said in its filing.

According to the PACER electronic disclosure system, on May 20, the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho granted the restraining order requests only in regard to Mr. Armon.

“The firm will be pursuing a claim through Finra.” said Morgan Stanley spokeswoman Christine Jockle. She declined to comment further.

“This is just three guys who want to change jobs,” said Steven Andersen, a Boise-based lawyer representing the three brokers. “I don't know why Morgan Stanley brought this to court.”

Morgan Stanley's request for a restraining order against the three brokers asked the court to demand they return “documents, records and information removed from MSSB or concerning MSSB's clients,” to prohibit the destruction of any such evidence that might be used in further proceedings against the three, and to prohibit them from soliciting any other Morgan Stanley employees.

Mr. Andersen said his clients had no documents or information to return to Morgan Stanley, and that Mr. Armon did not violate his employment contract.

In its complaint, Morgan Stanley accused Mr. Armon of violating the Protocol for Broker Recruiting as well as his employment contract, which prohibited him from soliciting other Morgan Stanley employees to join another firm for 18 months after leaving the company. The complaint alleged that Mr. Armon had already tried to solicit two other advisers in the Coeur D'Alene office and another in Washington state to join him at Stifel.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Featured video

INTV

Advisers beware: tax law has unintended consequences

Commission accounts could be preferable for some clients, and advisers could be incentivized to move from employee broker-dealers to independent channels.

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

Bond investors have more to worry about than a government shutdown

Inflation worries, international rates pushing Treasuries yields higher.

State measures to prevent elder financial abuse gaining steam

A growing number of states are looking to pass rules preventing exploitation of seniors.

Morgan Stanley reports a loss of advisers after exiting the protocol for broker recruiting

The firm said it lost 47 brokers in the fourth quarter, the most in any quarter of 2017.

Morgan Stanley's wealth management fees climb to all-time high

Improvement reflect firm's shift of more clients into fee-based accounts priced on asset levels, which boosts results as markets rise.

Legislation would make it harder for investors to sue mutual funds over high fees

A plaintiff would have to state in their initial complaint why fiduciary duty was breached, and then prove the violation with 'clear and convincing evidence.'

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print