SAC Capital's money-laundering settlement approved

The company was accused of reaping hundreds of millions of dollars in illegal profit through insider trades by employees dating to 1999

Nov 7, 2013 @ 8:30 am

Steven A. Cohen's SAC Capital Advisors LP won partial approval of its $1.8 billion settlement with the U.S. as a federal judge signed off on an agreement to resolve a civil money-laundering case against the hedge fund.

U.S. District Judge Richard Sullivan in the Southern District of New York on Wednesday approved the agreement after quoting an appeals court's instruction that a court's authority to review such civil settlements with the government is “minimal, at best.” He approved the settlement in a 15-minute hearing in Manhattan after questioning whether his acceptance is necessary.

SAC, which was indicted earlier this year, was accused of reaping hundreds of millions of dollars in illegal profit through insider trades by employees dating to 1999. Mr. Cohen, 57, wasn't charged. He still faces an administrative action filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission alleging that he failed to supervise his hedge fund's activities.

HEARING ON GUILTY PLEA

On Friday, U.S. District Judge Laura Taylor Swain will consider whether to approve SAC's guilty plea to securities fraud and wire fraud charges. SAC agreed Nov. 4 to plead guilty and pay $900 million in civil forfeiture and a $900 million criminal fine. The agreement credits SAC's earlier $616 million settlement with the SEC against the forfeiture amount, reducing to $284 million the amount still to be paid. SAC also agreed to end its role as an investment advisory firm.

“Whether I think $1.8 billion or $900 million or $284 million is a sufficient number is not really relevant today,” Mr. Sullivan said at the hearing.

Mr. Sullivan, in questioning the extent of his authority over the parties' settlement, referred to a March order from a New York-based federal appeals court in an SEC case against Citigroup Inc.

CITIGROUP CASE

In the Citigroup case, U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff in 2011 rejected a $285 million resolution of SEC claims the bank misled investors in a $1 billion financial product backed by risky mortgages. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York blocked the case from going forward while it considered the parties' appeal.

“While we are not certain we would go so far as to hold that under no circumstances may courts review an agency decision to settle, the scope of a court's authority to second-guess an agency's discretionary and policy-based decision to settle is at best minimal,” the court said in its March ruling. The court is still considering the appeal.

SAC's agreement with the government doesn't prevent prosecutors from bringing criminal charges against individuals at SAC. Prosecutors claim Mr. Cohen encouraged SAC employees to get information from company insiders while ignoring indications that it was illegal.

(Bloomberg News)

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Featured video

INTV

Here's how we came up with our list of undiscovered talent in mutual funds

Senior columnist John Waggoner talks with assistant managing editor Susan Kelly about how hard work, curiosity and passion landed some fund managers on our list.

Latest news & opinion

SEC advice proposal unveiling: Here's what to expect

Chairman Jay Clayton will initiate momentous action Wednesday, as the commission meets to debate a rule on broker and adviser standards.

How active are the largest actively managed funds?

Active-share measures for the 15 largest actively traded mutual funds.

Morgan Stanley's success looks long in the tooth to analyst

Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. analyst Christian Bolu, concerned over stalled adviser growth and what it means for lending and deposit growth, believes the stock will "under perform."

Retirement coverage gap, 401(k) rollovers are big emerging threats for plan advisers

Proliferation of state retirement programs approaching the 'tipping point' where it will lead the federal government to step in.

Biggest arb awards firms won from their brokers

These are among the biggest arbitration decisions that brokerage firms have won from their brokers over the past year. The awards highlight intra-firm battles.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print