Mary Beth Franklin

Retirement 2.0blog

Mary Beth Franklin on what your clients really want when they talk about retirement.

Duration of marriage and divorce affect Social Security benefits

But there is an exception to the two-year divorce rule

Feb 27, 2014 @ 10:32 am

By Mary Beth Franklin

Social Security, financial planning, retirement planning
+ Zoom

Regular readers of my InvestmentNews column know that to qualify for Social Security benefits on an ex-spouse's earnings record, the marriage has to have lasted at least 10 years, both of the former spouses must be at least 62 years old and the claimant must remain unmarried to collect benefits on an ex.

A few students of Social Security trivia may also know that it is possible to collect Social Security spousal benefits even if the ex-spouse has not yet begun collecting benefits — something that married couples can't do. However, there is an added hurdle when collecting benefits on an ex-spouse's work record if he or she has not yet begun collecting Social Security: the divorce must have been finalized for at least two years.

But it takes an eagle-eyed adviser, such as Larry McClanahan of Clackamas, Ore., to spot an exception to the two-year rule.

“I'm working with a 65-year-old female client who is in the process of divorcing her 67-year-old husband,” Mr. McClanahan wrote in an e-mail. “They were married more than 10 years and the husband is currently collecting Social Security,” he explained. “My client plans to continue running her business for several years and delay collecting Social Security until age 70, when she can collect the maximum benefit.”

Mr. McClanahan acknowledged that a divorced spouse normally must wait at least two years after the split-up is final to trigger spousal benefits on the other spouse's earnings record, if he or she has not yet begun collecting benefits.

“However, since the husband is already collecting Social Security, my read of the regulations indicates that once my client reaches her full retirement age of 66, the two-year requirement goes out the window,” he wrote. “At age 66, she will have the option to claim spousal benefits under her ex's record while delaying her own benefits until age 70.”

Right you are, Larry.

Because her ex-husband is already collecting his Social Security benefits, once she turns 66, she can file a restricted claim for spousal benefits and collect half of her ex-husband's full-retirement-age benefit. Her own benefit will accrue delayed retirement credits worth 8% per year for every year she postpones collecting beyond her full retirement age up to 70. At that point, she can switch to her own retirement benefit, which will be worth 132% of her age-66 benefit.

As the old saying goes, revenge is a dish best served cold. Four years should allow her plenty of time to savor her Social Security bonus.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

Events

How to effectively engage and serve female clients

It is clear building relationships with women is a proven way to grow your business. Heather Ettinger of Fairport Asset Management explains proven segmentation strategies.

Latest news & opinion

DOL fiduciary rule opponents want to push implementation back until 2019

ICI, Chamber of Commerce among groups asking for delay, while Democratic lawmakers call on DOL to keep to its earlier planned schedule of Jan. 1, 2018.

Take 5: Vanguard's new CIO Greg Davis talks bonds, stocks and costs

Having just stepped into the role, this veteran of the firm now oversees $3.8 trillion in assets in more than 300 mutual funds and exchange-traded funds.

Tech companies deploy behavioral finance tools for advisers

They seek to turn knowing more about clients into growing more revenue.

Retirement planning for women

Longer lifespans and lower savings require creative income strategies.

Sean Spicer resigns as press secretary after Anthony Scaramucci is appointed communications director

Scaramucci is known as an ardent foe of the DOL fiduciary rule, having said during the campaign that Trump would repeal it .

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print