Let the sunlight shine on fee disclosure

Mar 2, 2014 @ 12:01 am

There is a reason why the phrase “sunlight is the best disinfectant” has become a cliché. Originally penned by Louis D. Brandeis, the quote has rung true since 1914, when the esteemed justice published it in his book “Other People's Money and How Bankers Use It” (He actually wrote: “Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants; electric light the most efficient policeman.”)

Interestingly, the book, which is a collection of Justice Brandeis' essays, rails against investment bankers' using money deposited in their banks by middle-class citizens to consolidate industries and create monopolies that would then have the power to squeeze out competition and innovation, and pull more money from the pockets of hardworking Americans.

One hundred years later, the investment banking business is vastly different, and the checks and balances in place do a fairly good job of keeping monopoly power in check — though that point could be roundly debated. But the issue of other people's money and how it is handled remains nettlesome, and in the financial advisory business, the difficulty is related mostly to fees and expenses.

The Securities and Exchange Commission's recent investor bulletin that raises a red flag on fees and whether clients understand how their financial adviser is compensated is a welcome reminder that even if strides have been made in this area, there is still a lot of confusion, and much work needs to be done.


To be sure, the SEC already has regulations in place that spell out what disclosures investment advisers need to provide to clients. But clearly, the SEC is still finding that investors are coming up short in truly understanding not only what they are paying for advice and investment products but the long-term im- pact of those costs.

The SEC's Form ADV Part 2 requires investment advisers to list information about their fee schedule, and that is important. But when investments are thrown into the mix, costs can quickly become lost in a haze of fee-sharing arrangements, rebates, service charges, markups, surrender charges, custody fees and more.

In its investor alert, the SEC doesn't single out specific products or investment strategies but defines a number of different types of fees of which clients should be aware, including investment advisory fees. In addition, it highlighted the annual fees charged by mutual funds and exchange-traded funds, 401(k) fees, annual variable annuity fees and other charges related to minimum account balances, account transfers, account inactivity, wire transfer fees and others.


Beyond highlighting the importance of the straight facts about fees, the SEC pointedly drew attention to the impact that fees have over time and the need to make sure investors fully understand that, for instance, a fee as simple as 1% can cut a $100,000 investment by nearly $30,000 over 20 years.

Regulation for regulation's sake is not good for anyone in any industry, and fortunately, the SEC's investor alert does not suggest or portend a new raft of rules and documents that advisers will have to meet and fill out. If the agency is able to provide some further guidance, however, that could be helpful.

Still, for advisers, spending more time on fee disclosure would likely cost both time and money, but it would be time and money well spent because it would help level the playing field and raise the level of professionalism in the industry. The debate over fee-only versus commission-based versus a combination thereof potentially no longer would be an issue.

It isn't enough to slap together a table of fees, give it to a client and call it a day. Advisers need to sit down with their clients and go over all of their fees to be sure everything is fully understood, both today and tomorrow.

Justice Brandeis wouldn't have had it any other way.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

Apr 30


Retirement Income Summit

Join InvestmentNews at the 12th annual Retirement Income Summit - the industry's premier retirement planning conference.Much has changed - and much remains to be learned. Attend and discuss how the future is full of opportunity for ... Learn more

Featured video


When can advisers expect an SEC fiduciary rule proposal and other regs this year?

Managing editor Christina Nelson and senior reporter Mark Schoeff Jr. discuss regulations of consequence to financial advisers in 2018, and their likely timing.

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

Fidelity charging new fee on Vanguard assets held in 401(k) plans

The 0.05% fee is ostensibly a response to Vanguard's distribution model, but may also make the company's funds less attractive due to higher cost.

UBS adviser count continues to decline

Firm to merge U.S., global wealth management units on Feb. 1

TD Ameritrade launches all-night trading for ETFs

Twelve funds now can be traded after-hours, but the list will grow, company says.

Cutting through the red tape of adviser regulation is tricky

Don't expect a simple rollback of rules under the Trump administration in 2018 — instead, regulators are on pace to bolster financial adviser oversight.

Bond investors have more to worry about than a government shutdown

Inflation worries, international rates pushing Treasuries yields higher.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print