Subscribe

How to avoid year-end RMD errors

An expert's list of common mistakes advisers make when helping clients take required distributions

Advisers will soon be receiving calls from clients about taking year-end required minimum distributions from IRAs and other retirement accounts.

Avoid these common errors:

1. Not taking into account all retirement accounts subject to RMDs. Clients often have several individual retirement accounts or plans. Make sure they have taken all of those balances into account for calculating RMDs. In addition, they may have inherited IRAs subject to RMDs.

You need to have a complete inventory of accounts subject to RMDs. There is a 50% penalty for not taking an RMD, although the penalty can be waived for good reason by filing Form 5329 with the IRS and explaining that the client made an honest mistake, was confused or ill, or received incorrect information from the financial institution or adviser.

The 50% penalty also applies to missed RMDs from inherited IRAs and inherited Roth IRAs.

Learn How to fix a missed RMD (in five easy steps) here.

2. First-year RMD confusion. A common error is using the wrong balance for the first RMD. RMDs begin for the year a client reaches age 701/2. Use the Dec. 31 balance of the year before the first required distribution year, even if the actual first RMD is not taken in that year. For the first year, the law gives people until April 1 of the next year to take their first RMD.

For example, if Jim turned 701/2 at any time in 2015, his required beginning date is April 1, 2016. If Jim elects to take his first RMD in March 2016, he still must use the December 31, 2014 IRA balance to calculate his first-year RMD, since that is the year-end balance the year before he turned 701/2 .

3. Aggregation errors. When a client has multiple IRAs or company plans subject to RMDs, make sure they take their RMDs from the right plan or IRA. For example, you cannot satisfy an IRA RMD from a 401(k), and vice-versa. However, IRAs have a special aggregation rule that allows RMDs from IRAs (including SEP and Simple IRAs) to be taken from any one or combination of those IRAs. 403(b) plans have the same aggregation rule. But you cannot satisfy a 403(b) RMD from an IRA and vice versa. You also cannot satisfy an IRA RMD from an inherited IRA. IRAs inherited from the same person can be aggregated for calculating RMDs, but RMDs for IRAs inherited from different people cannot be aggregated. They must be calculated separately.

A husband and wife who each have IRAs and are each subject to RMDs must take those RMDs separately from their own IRAs. For example, a husband cannot satisfy his RMD from his wife’s IRA and vice versa, even though the total RMD for both will be reported on the same joint tax return.

4. “Still working” exception mistakes. A special exception to RMDs applies to those who are still working for a company, but this exception never applies to IRAs or to other plans of companies the employee no longer works for. The exception allows employees to delay RMDs until the year after they retire. It only applies to the RMD from the plan of the company the employee is still working for. This exception also generally does not apply to self-employed clients with a company plan.

The big mistake here is that this exception never applies to IRAs.

But this so called “still working” exception does not define “still working,” so it can apply even if the client worked only part time or for even a few days during the year.

5. Inherited Roth IRAs. While there are no lifetime RMDs for a client’s own Roth IRAs, inherited Roth IRAs are subject to RMDs and to the 50% penalty, even if the RMD would be tax-free, which they generally are.

6. Year-of-death RMDs. The confusion here lies in who takes a year-of-death RMD for a client who died and did not take their entire RMD for that year. The beneficiary takes that RMD based on the amount the decedent would have been required to withdraw had he or she lived. There is no choice here. The RMD is not reported on the estate income tax return of the decedent (Form 1041) or on the decedent’s final income tax return (Form 1040), as even some CPAs think.

Ed Slott, a certified public accountant, created the IRA Leadership Program and Ed Slott’s Elite IRA Advisor Group. He can be reached at irahelp.com.

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Once again, IRS waives RMDs for beneficiaries subject to the 10-year rule

The new relief on required minimum distributions for this year builds on previous IRS relief for RMDs in 2021, 2022 and 2023.

James Caan estate case highlights rollover rules advisors need to know

An offer the IRS refused! The estate owes nearly $1 million in taxes and penalties.

An unexpected double tax break for 529-to-Roth rollovers

There’s a chance to do two 529-to-Roth rollovers this year – but only if the first one (for 2023) is done by April 15.

High stock values and layoffs combine for big tax breaks on company stock

With the net unrealized appreciation tax break, company stock can be withdrawn from a 401(k) in a lump-sum distribution and have its appreciation taxed at capital gains rates, rather than as ordinary income.

Planning for the largest IRA balances ever in 2024  

Here are tactics to use this year given the opportunities for record stock values at the end of 2023.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print