Subscribe

‘Retirement Rip-Off Counter’ underscores impact of Department of Labor’s fiduciary rule delay

A counter adding up the $46 million retirement savers are losing daily from a delay of the Department…

A counter adding up the $46 million retirement savers are losing daily from a delay of the Department of Labor’s fiduciary rule will be projected onto federal buildings in Washington to protest the Trump administration’s efforts to postpone the regulation’s implementation.

In the spirit of the National Debt Clock that shows rising U.S. debt, a “Retirement Rip-Off Counter” will be projected on to the Dept. of Labor and U.S. Chamber of Commerce buildings Wednesday night, according to proponents of the fiduciary rule. The counter seeks to illustrate that Americans are losing $532 a second or $17 billion a year without a mandatory fiduciary rule for retirement advice. Such a regulation was set to take effect on April 10, but has been formally delayed and may be further put off or amended.

“The delay is a way for Donald Trump to make a $17 billion gift to Wall Street,” said Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., in a Washington news briefing on Wednesday.

(More: DOL fiduciary rule supporters question agency’s quick read of comment letters before sending final delay to OMB)

The Department of Labor released a final rule on Tuesday delaying the implementation of its fiduciary duty regulation by two months, providing a new applicability date of June 9. It’s set to be published in the Federal Register on Friday and takes effect immediately. Mr. Trump has asked the agency to modify or repeal the rule if it will limit investors’ access to financial advice or boost litigation for firms.

Rule opponents like the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, which represents brokers, and the Investment Company Institute, which represents mutual funds, have argued that the regulation is too complex, costly, and will restrict access to advice.

The dollar counter introduced on Wednesday is based on an estimate from the prior administration’s White House Council of Economic Advisors two years ago that estimated Americans lose about $17 billion a year – or $46.5 million per day – from receiving conflicted advice in their retirement accounts. It was started on Feb. 3, the day when President Trump first said he would target the fiduciary rule for delay and can be found at SaveOurRetirement.com. It shows so far Americans have lost $2.9 billion.

(More: Savvy RIAs are waving the fiduciary flag)

The media event included Vietnam veteran Stephen Wingate, 69, who described advice he received from his broker in Illinois on his retirement accounts that cost him $147,000, more than half of his initial investment. He had told the broker he wanted conservative investments, but was invested in non-traded real estate investment trusts.

“Never in my wildest dreams did I think someone who was managing my retirement savings could be legally allowed to put his interests ahead of mine,” said Mr. Wingate, who has filed a FINRA arbitration claim against the broker that is due to be heard in November.

Opponents of the fiduciary rule says that the current two-month delay is insufficient.

The DOL needs to act by June 9 to further delay or change the rule or “it risks creating significant market disruptions that will reduce retirement savers’ access to retirement products, services, and related financial information and advice,” the ICI said in a statement on Wednesday.

Related Topics:

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Celebration of women fostering diversity in the financial advice profession

Honoring the 2020 and 2019 InvestmentNews Women to Watch for their achievements and dedication to improving the financial advice profession.

Merrill Lynch veteran Michelle Avan dies

Avan recently became SVP and head of global women's and under-represented talent strategy, global human resources for Bank of America.

Finalists for Women in Asset Management Awards announced

More than 100 individuals were named on the short list for awards in 16 categories; the winners will be announced on Sept. 9.

Rethinking advisory fees means figuring out value

Most advisers still charge AUM-based fees, but that's not likely to be the case in 10 years, according to Bob Veres. Some advisers are now experimenting with alternative fee models.

Advisers need focus on growth and relationships, especially now

Business development expert Robyn Crane believes financial advisers need to be taking advantage of this unique time.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print