SEC charges three brokers with high-cost unsuitable trading

The regulator alleges the brokers recommended a pattern of high-cost frequent trading without telling clients that such a strategy was unlikely to produce profits

Sep 28, 2017 @ 5:59 pm

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

The Securities and Exchange Commission charged three brokers on Thursday with putting their clients into unsuitable investments involving frequently traded stocks that racked up commissions for them but left their clients with losses.

The agency filed a complaint against William C. Gennity and Rocco Roveccio, who worked as registered representatives from 2012 to 2014 at Alexander Capital LP, a New York City broker-dealer. It also reached a $411,107 settlement with another broker who worked at the firm during the same time period, Laurence M. Torres.

Mr. Torres, without admitting or denying the charges, also agreed to a bar from the securities industry and from penny-stock trading. The SEC will pursue its case against Mr. Gennity and Mr. Roveccio in a Manhattan federal district court.

The SEC alleges that each of the brokers recommended a pattern of high-cost frequent trading without telling clients that such a strategy was unlikely to produce profits because assets were held for short time periods. The brokers also engaged in churning, according to the SEC.

The agency said that losses totaled $683,038 for Mr. Gennity's and Mr. Roveccio's 11 clients, while they received approximately $280,000 and $206,000 in commissions, respectively. Mr. Torres' eight customers suffered losses of approximately $640,904, according to the SEC order.

"We have no tolerance for unscrupulous brokers, and our examiners and enforcement investigators are working together to proactively catch insidious practices before they spread and impact even more customer accounts," Andrew M. Calamari, director of the SEC's New York Regional Office and co-chair of the Enforcement Division's Broker-Dealer Task Force, said in a statement. He added: "As alleged in our complaint, [Mr.] Gennity and [Mr.] Roveccio each misled several customers by touting their ability to outperform the market while concealing that the cost to customers for this excessive in-and-out trading doomed any realistic possibility of these brokers making money for anyone other than themselves."

The SEC complaint said that their customers ranged from blue-collar workers with high school educations to small business owners and consultants.

But the attorney for Mr. Gennity asserted that the clients were successful business people who authorized the trades and pursued aggressive investment strategies.

"It's a very weak case," said Anthony Varbero, an attorney at the firm Joseph Mure Jr. & Associates. "It's highly unlikely that [the SEC] will succeed in the case."

Richard Roth, of the Roth Law Firm, who represents Mr. Roveccio, was not immediately available for comment. An attorney for Mr. Torres did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

B-D Data Center

Use InvestmentNews' B-D Data Center to find exclusive information and intelligence about the independent broker-dealer industry.

Rank Broker-dealers by

Featured video

Events

3 Questions to ask yourself when making your succession plan

Michael Futterman from Janus Henderson Investors has sage advice for advisers as they approach retirement.

Latest news & opinion

10 best states for retirement

When it comes to places to retire, here are the 10 best states for enjoying your golden years.

CFA Institute adding crypto, blockchain to curriculum

Subjects will be added to its Level I and II coursework for the first time next year.

Trump tax plan making dividend ETFs hot

Funds that are seeing inflows largely steer clear of sectors like utilities.

Wells Fargo Advisors continues to see a decline in brokers

Company also set aside $114 million over fees for rich clients.

Morningstar to replace funds in its managed portfolios with nine of its own

New sub-advised funds, offered exclusively through financial advisers, are intended to lower costs and provide 'greater flexibility.'

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print