What recent anti-ESG rhetoric gets wrong
In navigating the debate about environmental, social and governance investing, it's valuable to separate well-founded criticisms from misguided cynicism.
Recent critiques of environmental, social, and governance investing tend to seek emotive rather than rational appeal, with critics using words like “delusional,” “incoherent,” “scam,” “cabal” or “idiots.” Such rhetoric may fuel clickbait, but it distracts from valuable and inform
Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.
