Subscribe

Ed Slott on Roth IRA conversions becoming permanent

Investment News

Proposal would remove recharacterization option from advisers' toolkit.

Tax professionals are ringing alarm bells that a House proposal unveiled last week deserves financial advisers’ attention. Should the measure become law, taxpayers who decided to convert a traditional, or pre-tax, individual retirement account to a Roth IRA, would no longer be allowed to elect to change it back to a traditional account within a certain time frame. And that means advisers should be checking in on clients about Roths before the start of 2018, said Ed Slott, founder of Ed Slott’s Elite IRA Advisor Group in a conversation with InvestmentNews reporter Greg Iacurci.

This recharacterization of a Roth IRA is a strategy widely used among financial planners, but lawmakers have targeted it as an example of taxpayers being able to game the system, Mr. Slott said.

(More: Tax reform: How the House bill changes rules for retirement savings)

He explains why advisers need to stay focused on where this tax provision lands, and recommends that they reach out to all clients who converted the accounts this year, just in case.

(Click here to listen to podcast)

Related Topics:

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

SEC issues FAQs on investment advice rule

The agency published answers to four questions about Form CRS.

SEC proposes tougher sales rule for exchange-traded products

The agency, concerned about consumer protection, says clients need a baseline understanding of product risk

Pete Buttigieg proposes a ‘public’ 401(k) program

The proposal is similar to others seeking to improve access to workplace retirement plans but would require an employer match.

DOL digital 401(k) rule not digital enough, industry says

Some stakeholders say the disclosure proposal is still paper-centric and should take into account newer technologies.

Five brokers lose Ohio National lawsuit over annuity commissions

Judge rules the brokers weren't beneficiaries of the selling agreement between the insurer and broker-dealers.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print