Subscribe

FEDS WANT 401(K) PARTICIPANTS TO LEARN WHAT PLANS COST THEM: EDUCATIONAL BOOKLET WILL HELP INVESTORS UNEARTH BURIED FEES

The U.S. Labor Department is planning to help participants in employer-sponsored retirement plans figure out how much of…

The U.S. Labor Department is planning to help participants in employer-sponsored retirement plans figure out how much of their savings might be lost to fees.

The help is expected to come in the form of a booklet to educate investors in 401(k)-type retirement plans on the kinds of fees they might be paying for investment management and plan administration. Employers generally pick up the tab for administrative expenses, but in some cases, pass on those costs to plan participants.

Many retirement plans also charge participants a fee for processing loans taken out against their retirement accounts.

Moreover, some insurance companies and other service providers charge retirement plans a redemption fee, often called a back-end load, if they switch providers.

The Labor Department is expected to come out with the booklet sometime this spring.

Generic advice

Though department officials declined to discuss details of the booklet, representatives of several retirement industry groups who have met with the agency in recent months say the advice in the booklet is likely to be generic.

“What they want to do is provide participants with the tools to ask the right questions and get the right answers, so they are not being inappropriately charged,” says Brian H. Graff, executive director of the American Society of Pension Actuaries, an Arlington, Va., trade association.

The Labor Department might be especially interested in helping participants become aware of fees buried in the overall investment management expenses, says Dennis Simmons, principal in the legal office of the Vanguard Group in Valley Forge, Pa.

“I think the Labor Department just wants to heighten awareness of fees and the different types of fees you might see with a 401(k) plan,” he says.

At the same time, the department is working on guidelines for employers in comparing costs of various mutual funds, as well as investment funds offered by insurance companies and banks when setting up retirement plans, or switching service providers.

Rather than specifying a range of fees that is acceptable, the Labor Department’s pension office is likely to give employers broad guidance on how to determine exactly what they are paying for such services as daily valuation, record keeping and custody, on top of investment management fees, according to sources who have met with federal officials.

The Labor Department also is expected to remind employers of their fiduciary duty to ensure that fees they are paying for managing and administering retirement plans are reasonable and appropriate.

The Labor Department’s guidance to retirement plan sponsors is likely to be in the form of a checklist, telling employers how to compare the cost of each service they get from different providers, says Chris Bowman, director of pension services at the Principal Financial Group, a Des Moines, Iowa-based insurance company that administers 25,000 small and midsize 401(k) plans.

Mr. Bowman, who met with Labor Department officials last month, would prefer that regulators ask employers to comparison shop on the basis of total costs, including expenses employers will pick up, and the package of services offered by different providers.

“We were trying to tell the Labor Department that it doesn’t make sense to go to this itemized approach,” he says.

like annuity guidelines

The Labor Department had produced similar broad guidelines for employers some years ago on purchasing annuities, notes Stephen W. Kraus, chief pension counsel at the American Council of Life Insurance, a trade group in Washington.

“What we are trying to do is to educate the relevant community — participants and plan sponsors — so attention is paid to this question, and appropriate disclosure is made,” says Sherwin Kaplan, deputy associate solicitor for the Labor Department’s plan benefits security division, who is leading an investigation of abuses in the area.

Examples of such abuses include situations where employers benefit from fees paid by the plan, such as to outside accountants for auditing the plan as well as the company’s financial records. Mr. Kaplan’s office also is examining instances where service providers might have grossly overcharged plans.

Crain News Service

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

FASB may tighten rule for pension fund accounting

The Financial Accounting Standards Board is considering revamping how companies report pension fund gains and losses to give…

Indexing is the preferred technique

Many of the nation’s best and brightest finance professors are a boring bunch of investors. They generally subscribe…

GM consolidating investment teams

General Motors Asset Management Corp. is consolidating the investment management of its equities and fixed-income programs into two…

Retirement issues won’t fade after election

Expect retirement issues to remain in the spotlight in Washington next year, regardless of the outcome of tomorrow’s…

Cash-balance conversion called harmful by GAO

Older workers are hit hardest when employers convert traditional pension plans into cash-balance plans, but younger workers, who…

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print