Subscribe

Fidelity exec on 12(b)-1 cap: Advisers will still get paid

O'Hanley says expense will 'pop up' somewhere else; whack-a-mole for the SEC?

The Securities and Exchange Commission should address the fiduciary standard before attempting to reform12b-1 rules, fund executives said today at the Investment Company Institute’s annual membership meeting.

Last July, the commission said it was considering capping 12(b)-1 fees, and received over 2,000 comment letters, most of which opposed the proposal. With so much opposition and the commission’s facing a huge workload resulting from Dodd-Frank, many industry officials assumed the proposal was dead for now.

Last week, however, SEC Commissioner Elisse Walters said the commission plans to return to the proposal with full force after it gets past the July 21 deadline for implementing many of the Dodd-Frank rules.

Just doing away with 12(b)-1 fees isn’t likely to solve the problem, Ronald P. O’Hanley, president of asset management and corporate services at Fidelity Investments said during a panel discussion at the meeting.

“Advisers are still going to get paid, but the question is where will [the expense] pop up,” he said, adding that as it is, the proposal could result in higher pricing, revenue sharing and wrap fee costs.

“We should all be clear about what problem we are trying to solve,” Mr. O’Hanley said. “And we need to be mindful of the cost of implementing [the proposal].”

William F. Glavin, chairman, president and chief executive of OppenheimerFunds Inc., said it doesn’t make sense for the SEC to reform 12(b)-1 fees until it decides on whether to impose a fiduciary standard on brokers.
“Let’s not go through a multibillion-dollar industrywide effort to reform 12(b)-1,” if the fiduciary standard ruling results in fewer share classes, Mr. Glavin said during the discussion. “Let’s make sure we sequence this the right way,” he said.

In fact, not everyone at the conference is worried that 12(b)-1 reform is going to happen anytime soon. Between the SEC’s workload, and the beginning of the 2012 presidential campaign, it’s likely the proposed change will get put off again, said W. MacCarter Sims, head of intermediary distribution for Schroder Investment Management North America Inc.

“No one is going to want to touch this, once we get into election mode,” he said.

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Much-anticipated site for investors good news/bad news for advisers

BrightScope's new Advisor Pages allows reps and planners to connect with potentially vast numbers of prospective clients. It also highlights rules infractions and formal complaints lodged against advisers.

Gundlach’s fast-growing startup sees nearly $6B in inflows in a year

Despite months of legal wrangling with his former employer, TCW Group Inc., it appears that Jeffrey Gundlach's move to start his own firm is paying off

Guggenheim eyes combining Claymore and Rydex, sources say

Melding of two acquired units would create seventh-largest ETF provider; 'scale business'.

Why Fairholme’s Bruce Berkowitz doesn’t want to be Carl Icahn

Given the months of controversy surrounding his role as an activist investor with The St. Joe Co., a real estate developer, iconic fund manager Bruce Berkowitz isn't so sure that he wants to play that part again.

Look who’s defending Goldman Sachs and Bank of America

Bruce Berkowitz backs the two demonized financial titans; 'ethical good guys'.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print