Subscribe

MUTUAL FUND FEES ARE FAIR, STUDY SAYS, THOUGH OTHERS STILL SEE FAT IN FIGURES: SOMEONE HAS TO PAY FOR ANALYSTS, SERVICE

Do mutual fund companies deserve a break from the constant criticism of their management fees? A recent study…

Do mutual fund companies deserve a break from the constant criticism of their management fees?

A recent study and even some advisers suggests they do.

Mutual funds are priced reasonably, according to a study conducted by Boston-based Financial Research Corp., a firm that just happens to help mutual fund companies develop marketing strategies.

“Over the past few years, writes Neil Bathon, the firm’s president, “fund companies have become much more proactive in controlling fees than they had been previously, instituting asset-based break points in their funds’ fee structures.”

not bad, considering

Most financial advisers enjoy lambasting the fund industry, claiming it’s greedy given the amount of money it has raked in during the current record bull market. But at least one adviser agrees the average expense ratio for equity funds .942, according to FRC is pretty reasonable because fund firms do all the work for investors.

“I would gladly pay Fidelity Investments 1% to go and meet with 500 companies, and do all the research, because I don’t have the time to do that,” says Carl Zuckerberg, an adviser with Fleming, Relyea & Cox in Stamford, Conn.

“The press gets it wrong by automatically assuming that because assets triple, expenses should go down,” Mr. Bathon says. He points out that mutual funds have hefty start-up costs, and they have been upgrading services increasing analyst staff, providing 24-hour services for shareholders.

“These things all add up,” he says.

But others take issue with Mr. Bathon’s findings. Chicago-based mutual fund tracker Morningstar Inc., for example, has conducted its own study of expenses and reached a different conclusion.

still pricey

It indicates that even with enhanced services, expenses should have reflected the increase in fund assets. “The argument that services have improved, that’s certainly true,” says Amy Arnott, editor of the newsletter Morningstar Mutual Funds. “But you could say that
new cars today are better than they were 30 years ago, but you wouldn’t want to pay $30,000 for a Ford Escort.”

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Fear cyberterrorism? Try e-banking

The world is having a panic party over the cyberattack on Yahoo! Inc., E*Trade Group Inc., eBay Inc. and other websites.

Schwab: IPOs next, analysts say

Now that bourgeois Charles Schwab Corp. is planning to buy its way into the country club set, analysts say the next step is to serve up the kind of gourmet initial public offerings that rich folks are known to demand.

Bailout bunch draws ire of own investors: Lawsuites may follow 14 saviors hedge dredge for Meriwether fund

The Hurricane George of the financial markets - the disaster of a hedge fund known as Long-Term Capital Portfolio LP - could prompt a storm of lawsuits against the 14 securities firms and banks that joined forces last week to bail it out.

USE CHANGEUP, TOO, JOCKS

New York Yankee relief ace Mariano Rivera is known for his 98-mph rising fastball, but his investment portfolio isn't as likely to sizzle.

Q&A with Margo Alexander

When was the last time a Mitchell Hutchins person could hand you sharp metal instruments and feel safe?

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print