Subscribe

Principal Financial nixes federal cash infusion

The Principal Financial Group has declined to participate in the U.S. Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program.

The Principal Financial Group has declined to participate in the U.S. Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program.
On May 15, the Des Moines, Iowa-based insurer received clearance to take advantage of the program, a component of the Department of the Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program, along with five other insurers.
Yesterday, Principal chief executive Larry Zimpleman cited the company’s strengthened financial position, along with the improving credit and financial systems, for opting out of federal aid.
“We applied for the program in November 2008, when credit markets were inactive,” he said in a statement.
“CPP was intended to boost capital among healthy banks and insurance companies to encourage lending, but the economic conditions have now changed.”
Aside from the improvement in capital markets, the company recently took steps to bolster its capital by issuing a $1.15 billion secondary equity offering and a $750 million debt offering.
All but two of the TARP carriers have decided to pass on the federal government’s help: Ameriprise Financial Inc. of Minneapolis; Prudential Financial Inc. of Newark, N.J.; Allstate Corp. of Northbrook, Ill.; as well as Principal Financial.
The Hartford (Conn.) Financial Services Group Inc. yesterday said it would participate in CPP. That carrier received preliminary approval for $3.4 billion in aid.
Lincoln National Corp. of Radnor, Pa., has also received preliminary approval for $2.5 billion, but has not yet indicated whether it would take the aid.

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Stuck in the middle

Newly elected Finra board member whose firm is connected to a bribery scandal says the matter should have no effect on his ability to serve.

Fighting for market share in the LTC business

A handful of publicly held life insurers dominate the market for traditional long-term-care insurance, but mutual life insurers are beginning to make inroads with agents and financial advisers.

Breaking up is hard to do – especially with annuities

When a client came to his office bearing her new divorce decree, adviser Dale Russell became the bearer…

Longevity insurance promising – but higher rates would help

The Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service like it, as do many estate-planning experts. Now all…

Long-term care: Cutting back coverage

When a 74-year-old client visited Ellen R. Siegel six years ago with news of an upcoming 12% rate increase on the premium of her long-term-care insurance, the adviser knew she had to navigate the potential benefit cuts with the precision of a surgeon.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print