Subscribe

Putnam slashes expenses on some offerings

Putnam Investments has significantly lowered the expense ratios on its slate of Absolute Return funds and its RetirementReady Lifecycle funds

Putnam Investments has significantly lowered the expense ratios on its slate of Absolute Return funds and its RetirementReady Lifecycle funds.

At the high end, Putnam cut fees on its Absolute Return 100 Fund by 54%, lowering the total expense cap to 0.4% of fund average net assets. The fund aims to outperform inflation, as measured by Treasury bills, by 1%, net of all fund expenses.

The 300 version of the fund took a 37% cut in expenses, bringing its new total expense cap to 0.6% of fund average net assets.

Fees have also been cut on the 500 and 700 versions of the fund, falling by 24% to 0.9% of fund average net assets and 18% to 1.1% of fund average net assets, respectively.

The new expense caps are based on Putnam’s contractual obligation to limit the funds’ total expenses through at least Feb. 28, 2012.

Accordingly, Putnam has trimmed expenses for its suite of 10 target date funds.

The expense ratio of the RetirementReady Maturity Fund, which is designed for investors already retired, will be reduced by 24% to 0.74% of fund average net assets. The most costly fund, Retirement-Ready 2050, will experience a 4% reduction in expense ratios, bringing the new expense ratio to 1.04%.

The decision to bring down fees was made about a year after Putnam decided to cut management fees for a number of its fixed-income, asset allocation and target date funds.

At the time, the average expense ratio on its fixed-income funds fell to 0.92%, from 0.96%.

Further, the firm dropped its 0.05% wrap fee on the Retirement- Ready funds, reducing the average expense ratio to 1.15%, from 1.25%.

E-mail Darla Mercado at [email protected].

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Stuck in the middle

Newly elected Finra board member whose firm is connected to a bribery scandal says the matter should have no effect on his ability to serve.

Fighting for market share in the LTC business

A handful of publicly held life insurers dominate the market for traditional long-term-care insurance, but mutual life insurers are beginning to make inroads with agents and financial advisers.

Breaking up is hard to do – especially with annuities

When a client came to his office bearing her new divorce decree, adviser Dale Russell became the bearer…

Longevity insurance promising – but higher rates would help

The Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service like it, as do many estate-planning experts. Now all…

Long-term care: Cutting back coverage

When a 74-year-old client visited Ellen R. Siegel six years ago with news of an upcoming 12% rate increase on the premium of her long-term-care insurance, the adviser knew she had to navigate the potential benefit cuts with the precision of a surgeon.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print