Subscribe

Do human advisers make clients happier than robos?

Investors appreciate both, but do turn to traditional advisers over digital ones for some services.

Investors using digital financial advisers are nearly as happy as those who work with traditional advisers, though there are certain services that most people still want human help with, a new survey found.
About 75% of clients are satisfied or very satisfied with the advice and services they get from traditional financial planners, compared to 73% of those who work with an automated-investing platform, a survey of investors by the Financial Planning Association and Investopedia released Wednesday found.
About 7% of the 2,002 investors surveyed said they use a robo-adviser, 18% said they had checked one out online and 58% said they were at least somewhat familiar with automated platforms for advice. So-called robo-advisers like Betterment and Wealthfront provide financial advice to clients online with minimal human interaction.
(More: Robos to make banks a bigger competitor in advice market)
The services investors identified as ones they still prefer getting from a human financial adviser are: estate planning, elder-care planning, tax planning and health-care planning.
Education funding was an area where there was only a slight preference for having a human adviser over a machine. And investors were split on whether a human or robo-adviser was their top choice to provide help with finances related to buying a car or other large purchase, the survey found.
(More: Older investors use both financial advisers and online advice)
Many investors would like help from both traditional and online advisers, with 39% saying that’s how they’d prefer to receive investment planning services.

Would you prefer to receive these services from an automated-investing platform, a financial planner or both?
Source: FPA and Investopedia’s study, “High-Tech and High-Touch: Investors Make the Case for Converging Automated Investing Platforms and Financial Planning.”

“The debate about whether robos or human advisers will win is moot,” said David Siegel, chief executive of the financial education website Investopedia.
He expects investors will start to demand a combination of both the cheaper benefits that automated platforms offer and the customized approach of human advisers.
Ed Gjertsen, vice president of Mack Investment Securities and chairman of the Financial Planning Association, said advisers who just invest client assets are limiting their own success, and they are ignoring clients’ desire for comprehensive advice.
“The digital platforms offer an efficient way to manage client assets, which is a good thing,” he said. “Clients are looking for that to be complemented with comprehensive financial planning.”

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Celebration of women fostering diversity in the financial advice profession

Honoring the 2020 and 2019 InvestmentNews Women to Watch for their achievements and dedication to improving the financial advice profession.

Merrill Lynch veteran Michelle Avan dies

Avan recently became SVP and head of global women's and under-represented talent strategy, global human resources for Bank of America.

Finalists for Women in Asset Management Awards announced

More than 100 individuals were named on the short list for awards in 16 categories; the winners will be announced on Sept. 9.

Rethinking advisory fees means figuring out value

Most advisers still charge AUM-based fees, but that's not likely to be the case in 10 years, according to Bob Veres. Some advisers are now experimenting with alternative fee models.

Advisers need focus on growth and relationships, especially now

Business development expert Robyn Crane believes financial advisers need to be taking advantage of this unique time.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print