Subscribe

Finra taking a closer look at sellers of nontraded REITs

Nontraded real estate investment trusts and potential shortcomings in how broker-dealers sell them are clearly in the cross…

Nontraded real estate investment trusts and potential shortcomings in how broker-dealers sell them are clearly in the cross hairs of examiners from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc.

Over the past two years, Finra examiners have scrutinized “numerous retail sellers of nontraded REITs,” according to comments made late last month by Susan Axelrod, executive vice president of member regulation sales practices at Finra.

“RED FLAGS’

“In several instances, Finra examiners have found that firms selling these products failed to conduct reasonable diligence before selling a product and failed to make a determination that the product was suitable for investors,” she said in prepared remarks to the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association's Complex Products Forum.

“Finra examiners have noted that in the instances of REITs that have experienced financial difficulties, red flags existed and should have been considered by firms prior to the product being offered to firm clients.”

Independent broker-dealers' shortcomings in due diligence when selling complex, illiquid products have been a focus of Finra exams and fines since the market collapse of 2008. Finra recently has fined and sanctioned a handful of broker-dealers that sold two series of private placements that imploded in 2009 — Medical Capital Holdings Inc. notes and preferred shares of Provident Royalties LLC — citing shoddy due diligence.

Ms. Axelrod said that distributions, or dividends, of nontraded REITs also are on Finra's radar.

“Nontraded REITs may also borrow funds to make distributions if operating cash flow is insufficient,” she said. “Excessive borrowing may increase the risk of default or devaluation. In addition, nontraded-REIT distributions may actually be a return of principal.”

Financial advisers “must use caution when discussing distributions with investors, particularly when making comparisons to other dividend-paying investments,” she said.

Some broker-dealers, meanwhile, have failed to conduct adequate training for the advisers who sell the products, Ms. Axelrod said.

“Finra examiners are also reviewing advertising, sales literature and correspondence between brokers and investors, and — in some instances — have found misrepresentations of product features, such as distributions and share values,” she said. “All of these issues raise investor protection concerns.”

[email protected] Twitter: @bdnewsguy

Related Topics:

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Valuations for B-Ds and RIAs soar. Can it last?

Deals by LPL underscore surge in price propelled by the ongoing movement to fee-based revenue from one-time commission charges.

Barred Texas broker sold GPB fund without a license: SEC

"The only way to really address recidivism is through bringing criminal cases," one attorney said.

LPL shares hit fresh high after strong earnings

"Recruiting is as strong as ever" at LPL, one analyst noted.

Cetera’s Durbin says IPO clock has yet to tick

"Every private equity deal we have seen in the brokerage industry has lasted five to seven years," one executive said.

Finra bars ex-Wells Fargo broker firm accused of theft  

“We’ve done scores of theft cases over the years and it’s a cancer," said one attorney.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print