Subscribe

SEC busts RIA for padding advisory fees by 40%

The headquarters building of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) stands in Washington, D.C., U.S. Photographer: Joshua Roberts/Bloomberg

In addition to overcharging clients, Stephen Brandon Anderson overstated his assets under management in SEC filings.

The Securities and Exchange Commission charged North Carolina-based financial adviser Stephen Brandon Anderson with defrauding clients by padding his asset-based advisory fees by at least $367,000 over a two-year period.

The SEC order prohibits Mr. Anderson from acting in a supervisory or compliance capacity or charging advisory fees without supervision for at least three years, and requires him to provide notice of the SEC order to clients and prospective clients.

Mr. Anderson, who could not be reached for comment, owned and operated River Source Wealth Management, which was a registered investment adviser in Waynesville, N.C., from November 2010 through March 2017.

According to the SEC’s order, River Source’s primary revenue stream was asset-based advisory fees. The investigation found that in 2015 and 2016, Mr. Anderson “overcharged a majority of his clients.”

The overcharging varied, but, in aggregate, amounted to “approximately 40% more than the agreed-upon maximum customer advisory fees,” the SEC’s investigation found.

The SEC also found that Mr. Anderson exaggerated the RIA’s assets under management in public filings by at least 18% in 2015, and by 35% in 2016, and failed to implement required compliance policies and procedures.

Mr. Anderson agreed to a cease-and-desist order and a censure, and agreed to pay disgorgement and prejudgment interest of $405,381 and a $100,000 penalty.

Securities attorney Adam Gana, who was not involved in this case, said overcharging clients is becoming more common in the advisory space.

‘Without a more robust enforcement arm, I’m finding advisers trying to get away with more of this kind of thing,” Mr. Gana said. “With a growing pool of investment advisers, the SEC has to be more diligent than ever, particularly when it comes to overcharging clients, because it’s not something they would notice.”

Related Topics:

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Are AUM fees heading toward extinction?

The asset-based model is the default setting for many firms, but more creative thinking is needed to attract the next generation of clients.

Advisors tilt toward ETFs, growth stocks and investment-grade bonds: Fidelity

Advisors hail traditional benefits of ETFs while trend toward aggressive equity exposure shows how 'soft landing has replaced recession.'

Chasing retirement plan prospects with a minority business owner connection

Martin Smith blends his advisory niche with an old-school method of rolling up his sleeves and making lots of cold calls.

Inflation data fuel markets but economists remain cautious

PCE inflation data is at its lowest level in two years, but is that enough to stop the Fed from raising interest rates?

Advisors roll with the Fed’s well-telegraphed monetary policy move

The June pause in the rate-hike cycle has introduced the possibility of another pause in September, but most advisors see rates higher for longer.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print