Subscribe

SEC task force: Life settlements should be defined as ‘securities’

An SEC task force on Thursday recommended that life settlements be defined as 'securities,' thus making such transactions subject to federal securities laws.

An SEC task force on Thursday recommended that life settlements be defined as ‘securities,’ thus making such transactions subject to federal securities laws.
Bringing life settlements under the definition of security would require market intermediaries, including settlement brokers and providers, to register with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc., according to a report by the task force.
The task force, which has been studying the issue since September, found that while there are two regulatory frameworks addressing life settlements — one from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners and the other from the National Conference of Insurance Legislators — there are numerous variations in how the states actually adopt those rules.
Meanwhile, some 48 states treat life settlements as securities under state laws, but some states exclude the original sale from the insured person or the sale from the policy owner to the provider.
Finra currently oversees life settlements involving variable life insurance, but federal courts have reached different conclusions as to whether fractional interests in life settlements are indeed securities, according to the SEC report.
The task force recommended that SEC staff members ensure that settlement brokers and providers are sticking to legal standards of conduct, and that the staff watches for the development of a life settlement securitization market. Thus far, no securitizations have been registered with the SEC and offered to the public.
The task force also called upon Congress and state legislators to weigh applying stronger regulation to life expectancy underwriters and asked the SEC to consider issuing an investor bulletin on investments in life settlements.
Another report released today by the Government Accountability Office also criticized the patchwork of life settlement regulation in the states. Disclosure requirements can vary across jurisdictions, and policy owners could sell their policy without knowing whether they received a fair price or how much their brokers made, the GAO said.
However, inconsistent laws have also hampered industry participants, as some brokers and providers have had to deal with the cost of complying with different rules in multiple states, the GAO said. The organization called for consistent legal protection for similar products and services, including disclosures, sales practice standards and suitability requirements.

Related Topics:

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Bank of America sounds warning on options-ETF boom

Skeptics says products often fare worse than simpler alternatives.

Gold in flux as investors await Fed meeting

Following a 13 percent advance this year, the price of the yellow metal wavered as traders weigh the odds of harmful rate hikes.

Hedge funds ramp up tech allocations, says Goldman

Data show amped-up net buying in sector through long positions and short-covering even amid a slide in S&P 500 IT index.

Stocks rise following hot March inflation

The S&P 500 is poised to extend gains on tech earnings while short-term Treasury yields fell following brisk rise in Fed’s preferred inflation gauge.

Fed will cut once before presidential election, says Howard Lutnick

Cantor Fitzgerald’s chief executive predicts the central bank will “show off a little bit” just before voters head to the polls.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print