Subscribe

Want a smaller tax bite in retirement? It all depends on where you take income from

Minimizing taxes can go a long way toward prolonging a client’s retirement income stream — and it all…

Minimizing taxes can go a long way toward prolonging a client’s retirement income stream — and it all depends on which accounts are tapped for cash first.
The temptation to pull out of a large 401(k) or an individual retirement account may be great for individuals on retirement’s doorstep, but immediately tapping cash flow from these accounts could smack clients with high taxes, according to Robert S. Keebler, principal of Keebler & Associates LLP.
He spoke Tuesday afternoon on InvestmentNews’ webcast “Tax-Wise Ways to Draw Down IRAs and 401(k)s.”
Rather, advisers ought to consider a variety of factors, including the investment returns within each of the accounts a client holds, the taxability of Social Security, and current and projected income tax rates.
If future income is expected to be taxed at the same or lower tax rate, it makes sense to pull first from a taxable account. That’s followed by a tax-deferred account, such as a traditional IRA, and finally a tax-free account, such as a Roth IRA.
However, if future income is expected to be taxed at a higher rate, clients may want to consider taking from a tax-deferred account first, then taxable accounts and finally a tax-free account.
Mr. Keebler noted that the best way to apply a withdrawal strategy is to begin crafting a plan when the client is 55, as it will take time to make the strategy work.
In the meantime, advisers should consider the tax structure of the accounts in which they’re placing client assets. Naturally, tax sensitivity takes a back seat to a client’s risk tolerance and time horizon when making this decision, Mr. Keebler said.
He added that in order to mitigate the annual tax burden tied to bonds, advisers ought to move them to a client’s IRA. Meanwhile, assets that pick up capital gains, especially those a client expects to hold for a long time, should sit in a taxable account.
Investments that are expected to grow rapidly should go into a Roth IRA, Mr. Keebler noted.
Clients between 45 and 70 also may want to consider using life insurance as a component of their strategy. “We would want whole and universal life insurance — a policy that gives you a return that’s equal to what you would get in bonds,” Mr. Keebler said.
He added that clients in that age bracket aren’t necessarily loading up on insurance but rather taking advantage of its tax shelter properties.

Related Topics: ,

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

As indexed universal life sales climb, be sure to mind the risks

Advisers need to bear in mind that this cousin of traditional universal life insurance requires unique precautions.

Donald Sterling’s battle holds harsh lessons for advisers

The L.A. Clippers owner's fight with pro basketball highlights important tax and estate strategies that may surprise you.

Advisers fall short on implementation of long-term-care insurance

Most know it's a key part of retirement planning but lack in-depth knowledge when the need for care arises.

Broker-dealers face administrative hurdles in rollout of QLAC annuity

Confusion remains over who ensures the contract purchase meets Treasury's guidelines.

Finra arbitration panel awards $500,000 to former Morgan Stanley rep

Broker and wirehouse embroiled in a three-year dispute over a promissory note.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print