Wealthfront, staying true to robo roots, faces uphill battle in race for assets

Despite facing competitors growing at a faster clip, Wealthfront, one of the first big robo-advisers in the market, hasn’t announced any plans to expand its customer base by working with financial advisers or other financial services companies.

As far as growing assets, such a decision puts the company at a disadvantage, experts say. While Wealthfront is still a formidable figure in the robo market, competitors are gaining or running past it with large financial industry partners and extended business strategies.

“What their roots were founded in was bringing transparency and low cost to the market, and to stay true to that mantra they feel they need to remain completely independent,” said Sean McDermott, a senior analyst with Corporate Insights.

Wealthfront, which was founded in 2011, had about $2.8 billion in assets under management at the end of last quarter, according to its 13F report submitted to the SEC last week. That compares to a reported $2.5 billion in AUM in the third quarter, following a second quarter of $2.4 billion. This time last year, the firm had $1.7 billion in AUM.

Its main competitors have blown past that.

Betterment has reached $3.5 billion in AUM, according to its Form ADV filed on Monday. The New York-based robo grew to $3.3 billion as of the end of last quarter, tripling its assets from $1.1 billion the year before, its 13F forms show. The robo decided to extend its reach by launching Betterment Institutional, an adviser-facing robo platform, in late 2014, and Betterment for Business, a 401(k) plan provider for employers, earlier this year.

Financial giants made a splash too. Schwab Intelligent Portfolios’ assets, which combine the retail and institutional versions of the robo, reached $5.3 billion, after launching its retail side in March and institutional side in June, according to the company’s fourth quarter earnings.
Vanguard Personal Advisor Services, a hybrid model, hit $31 billion in AUM, after coming out in May with $17 billion already on the platform between rolled over accounts and new clients.

Wealthfront declined to comment for this story. A spokeswoman said the company does not disclose exact figures in between filings, but that the company has about $3 billion in AUM.
In a Quora Q&A in February, Adam Nash, CEO of the robo, said young companies have two advantages, pace of innovation and focus, over other competitors.

“Schwab rolled out an automated service in 2015 that looks a lot like our service looked in 2012,” he said. “Our job is to make sure that the gap in capabilities and value we deliver grows over time. Over the coming months & years you’ll see these inevitable dynamics play out.”

INTENSE COMPETITION
It certainly doesn’t help that competition is getting so intense in the robo market. A September research report by Cerulli Associates found that robo-advisers on average will need to grow by 50% to 60% per year for the next six years to attain $35 billion in AUM, which researchers said is the baseline robos will need to remain successful.

What makes Wealthfront different is its position to steer clear of financial advisers or corporate partners. Mr. Nash said the company plans to remain retail only, and that the human element isn’t always necessary with investing, according to an efinancialnews.com Q&A with the chief. Its Twitter account caters to that sentiment.

Don’t be afraid to start the year on the right foot! 5 irrational fears that keep people from firing their advisor https://t.co/AE0UiRbkzC

— Wealthfront (@Wealthfront) January 8, 2016

@ramblinpeck Probably anyone happy paying a quarter or less of what their advisor charges, for starters! 🙂 Let us know how we can help you.

— Wealthfront (@Wealthfront) October 6, 2015

@joncbacon Sounds like Mr. Dinges was lucky to find such a good friend and advisor. Doesn’t happen that way for many, that’s why we’re here.

— Wealthfront (@Wealthfront) August 28, 2015

There aren’t many robo-advisers that have remained purely direct to consumer. Many that do are younger than Wealthfront, and have fewer assets to manage. WiseBanyan, a self-proclaimed free robo-adviser now building out for-pay features, had $35 million in assets, according to its latest ADV.

Vicki Zhou, co-founder and co-chief executive of WiseBanyan, said being direct-to-consumer is the robo’s main focus because it lets the company help clients achieve their financial goals.

“Right now that is by providing them our services directly and helping them eliminate barriers to starting, like minimums or fees,” Ms. Zhou said. “Going forward, our strategic initiatives and anything we have for consideration, even if it involves other financial institutions, have to focus on providing the best possible product and access for our clients.”

LOW-HANGING FRUIT
Andrei Cherny, CEO of Aspiration, a direct-to-consumer online investment platform that lets the consumer choose its fees and manages about $23 million, said his company works directly with clients because it is working on building a customer relationship based on trust.

Last year, firms and institutions were picking up robo-advisers and their technologies to offer advisers, as another way to engage with clients. Many of those that didn’t buy a robo decided to build one instead.

Craig Iskowitz, chief executive of Ezra Group, a technology consulting firm in the financial advice industry, said Wealthfront needs to add a sweep of updates and additional resources to stay competitive.

“Now they are hitting the low-hanging fruit,” Mr. Iskowitz said. “In order to keep growing they need to pull from other advisers and they need to perform services advisers perform.”

Wealthfront came out with a portfolio review tool last month, which allows clients and prospective clients to get a free and immediate analysis on their portfolios. In July, the robo dropped its account minimum.

These two events are an indication that the company may be taking a step back to see what it can do to grow its client base, Mr. McDermott said.

“It is the reverse or opposite approach other firms have taken,” Mr. McDermott said. “Just thinking in the context of recent announcements they have made … it all does seem to point at a concerted effort to bring in more assets.”

Wealthfront has made strides to grow internally, and added three big hires in 2015 — in November, Mike Schroepfer from Facebook joined the company’s Board of Directors; in June, they hired a new chief financial officer, Ashley Johnson, who previously had worked at ServiceSource and Morgan Stanley; and in May, they brought on Kate Aronowitz, also from Facebook, as vice president of design.

One way Wealthfront might be able to pick up its game is by providing more engaging materials with potential clients, said Laura Varas, a principal at research firm Hearts & Wallets. It can do this by becoming a source of information rather than just a “set it and forget it” platform where clients can invest their money. She said clients have so many options these days and want to find a unique offering.

“It is not only about AUM — technology people also think of information flow,” Ms. Varas said. “So $2 billion in AUM is a failed mutual fund.”

Mr. Iskowitz said the robo needs to improve its website and add more free features, such as data aggregation and expense management.

“I think they are realizing they’re just a digital RIA and the robo-adviser mystic has worn off,” Mr. Iskowitz said. “That’s why their growth has slowed and their assets will go away if they don’t keep up and show more value added to consumers.”