Subscribe

Republicans attack stock-buyback tax as threat to retirement savings

The provision is part of the Inflation Reduction Act the Senate approved over the weekend and the House will take up this week.

Republican lawmakers accused Democrats of undermining retirement savings with a provision for a stock-buyback tax that is included in climate and health care spending legislation that gained Senate approval over the weekend.

The Senate voted along party lines, 51-50, on Sunday to pass the Inflation Reduction Act, a $790 billion bill that includes $386 billion in funding for climate-change and energy initiatives as well as $98 billion for health care programs, according to an analysis by the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.

The bill also contains about $468 billion in tax measures to pay for the spending and to achieve a net deficit reduction of $305 billion. The tax provisions include a 15% corporate minimum tax and an increase in IRS funding to strengthen enforcement. The spending and taxes occur over a 10-year period.

The bill advanced through the Senate on a special parliamentary procedure that sidestepped a filibuster. Vice President Kamala Harris voted for the bill to break the 50-50 tie. The House is expected to vote on the bill later this week.

Republican members of the House Ways & Means Committee didn’t wait for House debate to start to attack a provision in the bill that would impose a 1% excise tax on corporate stock buybacks by public companies. They asserted that the tax would erode returns on corporate stocks and diminish the value of 401(k) and individual retirement plans.

“Democrats are threatening companies that return value to retirees or to 401(k) plans or to pension plans with a punitive tax,” the Ways & Means GOP said in a statement on Friday. “Their unvetted stock buybacks tax is a crippling tax that reduces retirement security for American seniors.”

The House lawmakers based their argument in part on an analysis by Americans for Tax Reform, a conservative tax advocacy organization, which said retirement accounts hold the largest share of corporate-sponsored funds.

“When companies perform stock buybacks, these investors are the ones who benefit,” Mike Palicz of ATF wrote. “A tax on buybacks could dissuade companies from conducting this action and negatively impact retirement savings.”

Democrats said the tax on buybacks — which is based on legislation introduced last year Senate Banking Committee Chairman Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden, D-Ore. — was a way to stop an abuse of the tax code.

“Rather than investing in their workers, mega-corporations used the windfall from Republicans’ 2017 tax cuts to juice their stock prices and reward their wealthiest investors and their executives through massive stock buybacks,” Wyden said in a statement. “Even as millions of families struggled through the pandemic, corporate stock buybacks once again hit all-time highs. Stock buybacks are currently heavily favored by the tax code, despite their skewed benefits for the very top and potential for insider game-playing. My proposal with Senator Brown simply ends this preferential treatment and encourages mega-corporations to invest in their workers.”

The stock buyback tax is one of the few from a litany of tax increases on corporations and the wealthy that were included in the original $3.5 trillion Build Back Better bill last year. That legislation was whittled down to the Inflation Reduction Act in order to garner enough Democratic support in the Senate.

The 1% buyback tax is not likely to change corporate behavior but it could grow in future legislation as a spending offset, said Jaret Seiberg, managing director at Cowen Washington Research Group.

“That means there is both a risk that it increases higher than 1% in the coming years and that it is extended to keep it from expiring in 10 years as now scheduled,” Seiberg wrote in an analysis.

[Read more: Senate bill would give CFTC more sway over crypto trading]

Related Topics:

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Wealth firms must prepare for demise of non-competes, despite legal challenges to FTC rule

A growing sentiment against restricting employee moves could affect non-solicitation, too.

FPA, CFP Board diverge on DOL investment advice proposal

While the CFP Board supports the proposal, the FPA has expressed concerns about the DOL rule potentially raising compliance costs for members, increasing the cost of advice and reducing access to advice for some.

Braxton encourages RIAs to see investing in diversity as a business strategy

‘If a firm values its human capital, then it will make an investment to make sure that their talent can flourish for the advancement of the bottom line,’ says Lazetta Rainey Braxton, co-CEO of 2050 Wealth Partners.

Bill chips away at SALT block but comes with drawbacks, advisors say

'I’d love to see the [full] SALT deduction come back but not if it means rates go up,' one advisor says.

Former Morgan Stanley broker running for office reviewing $147K award

Deborah Adeimy claimed firm blocked her from running in GOP primary, aide says 'we're unclear how award figure was calculated.'

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print