Estate tax limbo is keeping lawyers busy

Many are drawing up plans that will likely need updating next year

Oct 10, 2010 @ 12:01 am

By Noah Manley

With fewer than a dozen weeks remaining until the end of the year, estate attorneys are scrambling to make sure that ultrarich families who have lost a family member this year make the most of 2010's unusual estate tax lapse.

“It's like there's a fire sale,” said Jerry Jones, an estate-planning attorney with Jones & Quinlisk LLC. “And four patriarchs of some of my biggest families have died this year.”

Although Congress could reinstate the federal estate tax retroactively to cover 2010, the move is generally thought unlikely. As a result, whatever is put into a trust by someone who dies this year will never be subject to taxation — even if the estate tax returns, as scheduled, in 2011.

With stakes so high, Mr. Jones is busy putting in place estate plans and transfer structures that he knows may have to be jettisoned soon to suit new regulations.

Estate attorney Lynnmarie Johnson concedes that whatever she does over the next few months may have to be revisited next year.

“I try not to be put in that position, but yes, it could certainly be the case,” she said.

According to Kenneth Brier of Brier & Geurdin LLP, the best way for attorneys to avoid busywork connected with changes to estate tax laws is to “use formula language that should work in a variety of tax settings” and require little alteration.

Any legal change is expensive. If attorneys have to revamp plans next year to suit new realities in estate regulation, the meter will be running at anywhere between $200 and $1,000 per hour.

Attorneys are likely, however, “to give clients some serious discounts,” Ms. Johnson said. “We have to eat, but we don't have to get fat,” she said.

Lawyers with old and ailing clients are especially aware of this year's unusual tax environment because hundreds of millions of dollars potentially are at stake for individual families. For such ultrawealthy families, it makes sense to have plans in place for all senior family members, even if they are healthy, estate attorneys said.

Another worry for estate attorneys, according to Mr. Jones, is uncertainty around the future of grantor-retained annuity trusts. Although hailed by wealth managers as sleek vehicles for making large, and largely tax-free, gifts to family members, GRATs are viewed by some politicians as loopholes for a privileged few.

Moves to restrict them have so far come to nothing, but the vehicles still are under threat. As a result, family office attorneys are scrambling to establish old-line GRATs while they can and trying to come up with new formulations for tax-conscious gift giving to replace GRATs if they are made toothless.

Attorneys are also responding to uncertainty about the impact on high-wealth families of recent financial-industry-reform legislation.

The Dodd-Frank Act seems to leave most family offices free from regulatory oversight. But a minority of such offices are partnerships, and they, as well as those that provide co-investment incentives to employees and others, could be forced to register as investment advisers.

A worse-case scenario brings many more family offices under regulatory scrutiny as legal custodians — an unintended byproduct of paying bills for the families they serve.

Although wealthy families chafe at the compliance costs and loss of privacy associated with registration, some family office attorneys are looking into it anyway, said Christopher Winn of AdvisorAssist, a firm that helps to establish and administer registered investment adviser firms.

Other attorneys are examining the feasibility of family offices' becoming private trust companies instead of RIAs, said Lisa Ryan, a managing director of the family office recruiting firm Rankin Group Ltd.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

Apr 30


Retirement Income Summit

Join InvestmentNews at the 12th annual Retirement Income Summit - the industry's premier retirement planning conference.Much has changed - and much remains to be learned. Attend and discuss how the future is full of opportunity for ... Learn more

Featured video


Why some retirement plan advisers think Fidelity is invading their turf

InvestmentNews editor Frederick P. Gabriel Jr. and reporter Greg Iacurci talk about this week's cover story that looks at whether Fidelity Investments is stepping on the toes of retirement plan advisers.

Latest news & opinion

Speculation mounts on whether others will follow UBS' latest move to prevent brokers from leaving

UBS brokers must sign a 12-month non-solicit agreement if they want their 2017 bonuses.

Maryland jumps into fiduciary fray with legislation requiring brokers to act in best interests of clients

Legislation requires brokers to act in the best interests of clients.

8 apps advisers love for getting stuff done

Smartphone apps that advisers are using in 2018 to run their business more efficiently.

Galvin's DOL fiduciary rule enforcement triggers industry plea for court decision

Plaintiffs warned the Fifth Circuit that Massachusetts' move against Scottrade signaled that the partially implemented regulation can raise costs for financial firms.

Social Security underpaid 82% of dually entitled widows and widowers

Agency failed to tell survivors that they could switch to a higher retirement benefit later.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print