Undoing a decision to claim benefits

Nov 18, 2012 @ 12:01 am

I received an interesting question from a reader who had started collecting reduced Social Security benefits at 62 and had banked all the benefits.

She wonders if she can repay the money and apply for higher benefits at her current age of 65.

No, she can't repay her benefits.

The rules changed in December 2010. Your clients now have only a 12-month window to repay Social Security benefits after first claiming them. When benefits restart later, they will be based on the client's age at that time, resulting in a higher benefit.


But there is another option for those who change their mind about the best age to claim Social Security benefits after the 12-month window has closed. Once clients reach the normal retirement age of 66, they can suspend their benefits, which will rise by 8% a year between 66 and 70.

If clients wait until they're 70 to resume claiming, the resulting monthly benefit will be 99% of what they would have received if they had waited until 66 to collect in the first place.

Here is how the math works.

Assume that a client is entitled to collect $2,000 per month at 66 but decides to collect benefits early, at 62, knowing that those benefits will be reduced by 25%. The client collects $1,500 per month and is satisfied.

As time goes on, however, the client regrets not waiting for the bigger payout. At 66, he or she can suspend Social Security benefits.

Using the $1,500 monthly amount as the base and benefit growth of 8% annually, benefits will be worth 32% more when the client is 70.

That is $1,980 ($1,500 x 1.32), which happens to be 99% of the original full benefit amount.

Using this strategy can be a great way to undo an ill-advised decision to claim early.

mbfranklin@investmentnews.com Twitter: @mbfretirepro


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Featured video


Top questions surrounding future of DOL fiduciary rule

Reporter Greg Iacurci and managing editor Christina Nelson discuss the biggest uncertainties springing from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals' decision to vacate the regulation.

Latest news & opinion

What the next market downturn means for small RIAs

Firms that have enjoyed AUM growth because of the runup in stocks may find it hard to adjust to declining revenues if the market suffers a major correction.

DOL fiduciary rule likely to live on despite appeals court loss

Future developments will hinge on whether the Labor Department continues the fight to remake the regulation its own way.

DOL fiduciary rule: Industry reacts to Fifth Circuit ruling

Groups on both sides of the fiduciary debate had plenty to say.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals vacates DOL fiduciary rule

In split decision, judges say agency exceeded authority.

UBS, after dumping the broker protocol, continues to see brokers come and go

The wirehouse has seen 14 individuals or teams leave and five join for a net loss of $2.4 billion in AUM


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print