On Retirement

Why the merry widow is so merry

Jan 20, 2013 @ 12:01 am

By Mary Beth Franklin

S

eniors involved in later-life romances sometimes choose to live together rather than remarry, in order to preserve pension benefits of a previous spouse or to avoid becoming responsible for the debts of their new partner, including long-term-care costs.

But cohabitating simply to maintain Social Security benefits of a deceased mate — or even a departed ex-spouse — is unnecessary in most cases.

Surviving spouses can collect benefits as early as 60, or 50 if they are disabled, but the amount will be reduced substantially compared with collecting survivor benefits at full retirement age.

The same rules apply to divorced spouses who were married at least 10 years. In most cases, they aren't entitled to spousal or survivor benefits of an ex if they remarry.

AN EXCEPTION

But there is an exception for those who wait until 60 or later to remarry, and it is fascinating.

At 66, the full retirement age for survivor benefits for those born between 1945 and 1956 (which are slightly different birth years than those for full retirement benefits), a surviving spouse or ex-spouse is entitled to 100% of what the deceased worker collected or was eligible to collect at the time of his or her death.

But if a widow or widower collects survivor benefits as soon as possible at 60, the benefit is reduced to 71.5% and the survivor is subject to the earnings cap if he or she continues to work while collecting survivor benefits. If eligible, a survivor can switch to his or her own retirement benefits any time between 62 and 70.

Generally, a divorced spouse loses benefits of an ex-husband or ex-wife upon remarriage. But there is an exception if the ex-spouse dies and the surviving divorced spouse waits until 60 or later to remarry.

Ex-widows or widowers can continue to collect survivor benefits, assuming that they are larger than any other benefit to which they are entitled on their own work record or as the spouse of a new mate.

Many financial advisers are familiar with these basic rules of survivor benefits and remarriage, but there is a wrinkle that I recently learned about, and I have to thank an InvestmentNews reader for bringing it to my attention.

Frank, an adviser in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., encountered this situation with one of his clients.

A divorced woman who was collecting survivor benefits on her ex-husband's earnings record decided to remarry at 66.

The man she planned to marry was also divorced. He had wisely filed a restricted claim for spousal benefits only on his ex-wife's earnings record and planned to delay collecting his own retirement benefit until it was worth the maximum amount at 70.

So we know that the surviving ex-wife can continue to collect survivor benefits because she waited until after 60 to remarry.

But the question is whether the new husband would lose his spousal benefit based on his ex-wife's earnings record because he remarried?

I contacted the Social Security Administration for the answer. It turns out that the new husband won't lose his spousal benefit when he remarries someone who is collecting survivor benefits.

I was floored.

“The divorced spouse's benefit is not affected when a person marries an individual entitled to widow's benefits,” said SSA spokeswoman Kia Green Anderson.

That means that the new husband can continue to collect spousal benefits on his ex, even after his remarriage to the merry widow.

mbfranklin@investmentnews.com Twitter: @mbfretirepro

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Featured video

Events

What to do when your partnership ends

Breaking up is hard to do: and that is certainly true when it comes to advisory firms. Financial Adviser Rob Holdford tells his story and explains how you can survive and thrive when a partnership dissolves.

Video Spotlight

The Search for Income

Sponsored by PGIM Investments

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

T. Rowe Price steps up its game to serve financial advisers

The Baltimore-based mutual fund giant is more aggressively targeting financial advisers with a beefed-up wholesale crew and placement on custodial platforms.

The most important tax changes for 2018

The Internal Revenue Service issued inflation adjustments to more than 50 tax provisions for 2018.

Shift to Roth 401(k)s 'highly likely' part of tax reform: former Treasury official Mark Iwry

Mandated contributions to Roth accounts would likely only be partial, as opposed to having a full repeal of pre-tax accounts.

E*Trade acquiring custodian Trust Company of America

Discount broker buying second-tier custodian for $275 million.

Another thousand Dow points higher, and investors yawn

Market milestones keep falling like dominoes, with 51 records broken so far this year.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print