Why the merry widow is so merry

Jan 20, 2013 @ 12:01 am

By Mary Beth Franklin

S

eniors involved in later-life romances sometimes choose to live together rather than remarry, in order to preserve pension benefits of a previous spouse or to avoid becoming responsible for the debts of their new partner, including long-term-care costs.

But cohabitating simply to maintain Social Security benefits of a deceased mate — or even a departed ex-spouse — is unnecessary in most cases.

Surviving spouses can collect benefits as early as 60, or 50 if they are disabled, but the amount will be reduced substantially compared with collecting survivor benefits at full retirement age.

The same rules apply to divorced spouses who were married at least 10 years. In most cases, they aren't entitled to spousal or survivor benefits of an ex if they remarry.

AN EXCEPTION

But there is an exception for those who wait until 60 or later to remarry, and it is fascinating.

At 66, the full retirement age for survivor benefits for those born between 1945 and 1956 (which are slightly different birth years than those for full retirement benefits), a surviving spouse or ex-spouse is entitled to 100% of what the deceased worker collected or was eligible to collect at the time of his or her death.

But if a widow or widower collects survivor benefits as soon as possible at 60, the benefit is reduced to 71.5% and the survivor is subject to the earnings cap if he or she continues to work while collecting survivor benefits. If eligible, a survivor can switch to his or her own retirement benefits any time between 62 and 70.

Generally, a divorced spouse loses benefits of an ex-husband or ex-wife upon remarriage. But there is an exception if the ex-spouse dies and the surviving divorced spouse waits until 60 or later to remarry.

Ex-widows or widowers can continue to collect survivor benefits, assuming that they are larger than any other benefit to which they are entitled on their own work record or as the spouse of a new mate.

Many financial advisers are familiar with these basic rules of survivor benefits and remarriage, but there is a wrinkle that I recently learned about, and I have to thank an InvestmentNews reader for bringing it to my attention.

Frank, an adviser in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., encountered this situation with one of his clients.

A divorced woman who was collecting survivor benefits on her ex-husband's earnings record decided to remarry at 66.

The man she planned to marry was also divorced. He had wisely filed a restricted claim for spousal benefits only on his ex-wife's earnings record and planned to delay collecting his own retirement benefit until it was worth the maximum amount at 70.

So we know that the surviving ex-wife can continue to collect survivor benefits because she waited until after 60 to remarry.

But the question is whether the new husband would lose his spousal benefit based on his ex-wife's earnings record because he remarried?

I contacted the Social Security Administration for the answer. It turns out that the new husband won't lose his spousal benefit when he remarries someone who is collecting survivor benefits.

I was floored.

“The divorced spouse's benefit is not affected when a person marries an individual entitled to widow's benefits,” said SSA spokeswoman Kia Green Anderson.

That means that the new husband can continue to collect spousal benefits on his ex, even after his remarriage to the merry widow.

mbfranklin@investmentnews.com Twitter: @mbfretirepro

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

Events

Building digital relationships with a human touch

The word "robo" has stopped being a four-letter word for financial advisers. But how can it be an asset? Quovo's Jeff Hendren explains.

Video Spotlight

Will It Last As Long As Your Clients Do?

Sponsored by Prudential

Video Spotlight

The Catalyst

Sponsored by Pershing

Latest news & opinion

Collective investment trusts getting more attention from 401(k) advisers

The funds are catching on due largely to lower costs and more product availability, but come with some inherent drawbacks.

Vanguard rides robo-advice wave to $65B in assets

Personal Advisor Services, four times the size of its closest competitor, combines digital and human touch.

CFPs, including brokers, may have to adhere to a stricter fiduciary duty

CFP Board revises its standards and aims to beef up fiduciary requirements of certificants.

CFP Board's proposal to expand fiduciary duty draws praise, carries risks

Some question whether brokers will drop the CFP mark or if the CFP Board will strictly enforce its new standard.

Meet our new 40 Under 40s

Introducing 40 young leaders in financial advice. Learn how their passions are driving their success and fueling the future of the industry at large.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print