The succession strategy to defer taxes

A 50% increase in capital gains tax rates makes this a good time to consider an ESOP

Apr 16, 2014 @ 1:40 pm

By Carl Grassi

calculator
+ Zoom

In the six-year period ending in 2012, taxpayers were reluctant to structure transactions to defer taxes because tax rates were very low (especially on capital gains).

Why defer taxes if rates are only going to increase? As of last year, the highest tax rate on most capital gains rose to 23.8% (which includes the additional tax on investment income).

This rate is more than 50% higher than rates were in 2012. Many observers think it is very unlikely that these rates will be going up anytime soon. This may, therefore, be a good time to once again consider techniques for deferring taxes, especially on significant transactions such as the sale of a company.

Driven in part by the current tax rate structure, many business owners are considering employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs) as part of their succession plan.

The basic mechanics of an ESOP are relatively straightforward. The company forms an ESOP, which is essentially a qualified retirement plan. It is similar in many ways to a 401(k) or profit sharing plan, except that its primary asset is stock of the sponsoring company.

The ESOP contracts to purchase stock of the company from one or more selling shareholders at a price determined by a qualified appraisal. In order to effectuate the purchase, the company often will borrow the necessary funds from a qualified lender (i.e., a bank or other lending institution).

This is called a “leveraged” ESOP. The company immediately lends this money to the ESOP, and the ESOP uses the money to pay the purchase price to the shareholders for the acquired shares.

There are many benefits to using an ESOP to acquire shares in a closely-held company. First, the ESOP essentially creates a market for a minority interest in the company. While many ESOPs are formed to purchase at least a 30% interest in the sponsoring company to take advantage of the tax deferral described below, there is no minimum percentage that the ESOP can purchase.

Selling a minority interest in the company to an ESOP can allow the current shareholders to maintain control of the business and remain employed by the company.

There can also be significant tax benefits to the shareholders. If the company is a C corporation, as long as the ESOP owns 30% or more of the company shares after the acquisition, the selling shareholders can generally defer the income tax on the gain from the sale of the stock.

Provided the proceeds received by the selling shareholders are rolled over into “qualified replacement property,” no tax is due on the sale of the shares to the ESOP. Selling shareholders can transfer the qualified replacement property by gift or upon death without triggering the deferred gain.

This allows a business owner to diversify his or her investment in the closely-held business without triggering any gain, and completely eliminating the gain if the qualified replacement property is held until the shareholder's death.

There are also benefits to the company. From a tax standpoint, the company will get a tax deduction for the interest paid to the lender and for an amount equal to the principal payments, generally not in excess of 25% of the eligible compensation of ESOP participants.

Another reason to consider an ESOP is to create a stock-based retirement plan for employees to replace or supplement existing plans.

Many business owners like the idea of employees thinking of themselves as owners of the company, but do not like the idea of giving employees voting rights, holding shareholder meetings, and entering into shareholder agreements with the employees to buy back the stock upon termination of employment.

An ESOP can eliminate many of these concerns because, like other types of qualified plans, ESOPs provide the employees with a beneficial ownership interest in the equity of the company but generally without the voting and other rights of a shareholder.

An ESOP will not work in every situation. Having a sufficient number of employees with relatively low turnover is important. Most companies implement an ESOP with borrowed money, meaning the company needs to have sufficient capacity for additional debt.

Also, the costs of setting up and maintaining an ESOP are not insignificant, and an experienced team of legal and financial professionals is critical to the successful adoption and operation of an ESOP. Despite these concerns, an ESOP should be a part of the discussion for any business owner considering succession planning.

Grassi is president of Cleveland-based law firm McDonald Hopkins LLC.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

Apr 30

Conference

Retirement Income Summit

Join InvestmentNews at the 12th annual Retirement Income Summit - the industry's premier retirement planning conference.Much has changed - and much remains to be learned. Attend and discuss how the future is full of opportunity for ... Learn more

Featured video

Events

Why ESG strategies are appealing to women investors

Women and millennials want to invest in strategies that align with their value system. Debra Ohstrom of Allianz Global Investors explains.

Latest news & opinion

Jay Clayton says SEC, DOL can give market 'clarity' on fiduciary rule

Chief regulator is confident two agencies could reach 'common ground' on an investment advice standard across all accounts.

Vanguard winning at bond inflows, too

But iShares is strong competition.

Sen. Gary Peters brings broker background to work every day on Capitol Hill

Michigan Democrat resists ripping up DOL fiduciary rule but would be open to some changes.

DOL fiduciary rule causing DC-plan record keepers to change business with insurance agents

Principal has communicated that independent agents must change their business models to keep receiving compensation.

DOL fiduciary rule opponents want to push implementation back until 2019

ICI, Chamber of Commerce among groups asking for delay, while Democratic lawmakers call on DOL to keep to its earlier planned schedule of Jan. 1, 2018.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print