Regulators need to put record keepers in their cross hairs

Brokers and investment advisers aren't the only ones
who should take the heat for rollover activity

Apr 20, 2014 @ 12:01 am

Ever since the Government Accountability Office issued a report a year ago which found that employees moving from one company to another were being unduly influenced to roll their 401(k) funds into individual retirement accounts, regulators have been turning up the heat on brokers and investment advisers on rollover activity. Well, maybe it's time they put 401(k) record keepers in their cross hairs as well.

As InvestmentNews' Darla Mercado reported last week, some record keepers seem to be creating mountains of red tape when employees try to move their 401(k) fund into a new employer's plan.


In many cases, these record keepers have an inherent financial interest in convincing employees that they would be better off leaving the funds where they are or rolling the money into an IRA managed by the record keepers themselves.

As one retirement adviser noted: "The paperwork is fairly convoluted. [Providers] hope that people will throw their hands up in frustration and leave their money there."

The problem is, in some cases, the employee would be better off rolling his or her 401(k) funds into a new employer's plan, where the investment options might be better than in the old plan. Or the employee might find that a company other than the record keeper is a better choice to handle the IRA rollover.


What employees need is honest, straightforward advice — someone to explain in plain English all of their options and how they should go about researching each one. That is, in fact, what the record keepers are supposed to be doing.

But if record keepers are not doing their job, retirement plan advisers are going to have to step in to see that it gets done. If that means running interference between the employee and the record keeper, so be it.

Meanwhile, the Labor Department should make sure that record keepers are educating their own workers, many of whom work in call centers, as to their obligation to provide impartial, objective advice and make sure they are not creating unnecessary roadblocks that ultimately favor the record keeper's own ends.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Featured video


What's the first thing advisers should do when they get home from a conference?

After attending a financial services conference, advisers can be overwhelmed by options, choices and tools. What's the first thing they should do when they get back to their office?

Latest news & opinion

Maryland jumps into fiduciary fray

Legislation would require brokers to act in best interests of clients.

8 apps advisers love for getting stuff done

Smartphone apps that advisers are using in 2018 to run their business more efficiently.

Galvin's DOL fiduciary rule enforcement triggers industry plea for court decision

Plaintiffs warned the Fifth Circuit that Massachusetts' move against Scottrade signaled that the partially implemented regulation can raise costs for financial firms.

Social Security underpaid 82% of dually entitled widows and widowers

Agency failed to tell survivors that they could switch to a higher retirement benefit later.

Is Fidelity competing with retirement plan advisers?

As the Boston-based mutual fund giant expands the products and services it brings to the retirement market, some financial advisers say the firm is encroaching on their turf.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print