Outside-IN

Outside-INblog

Outside voices and views for advisers

Why 401(k) advisers should be aware of contractual language limitations

A contract may not protect advisers to the extent they believe

Jan 18, 2018 @ 11:19 am

By Marcia S. Wagner

As counsel for investment managers and investment advisers, we endeavor to draft documents precisely, making clear the obligations of our clients and seeking to limit their exposures to the extent permissible by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.

However, a recent district court decision from the Northern District of California, in the case Terraza v. Safeway, indicates limitations in the extent to which contractual language can protect investment advisers with respect to claims for breach of fiduciary duty under ERISA.

Aon, a co-defendant in the case, along with Safeway, argued that its master consulting agreement with Safeway established its robust process in providing ongoing consulting and performance evaluation, including detailed quarterly reports addressing fund structure, performance and other characteristics, quarterly meetings with the client and investment managers, and regular client communications.

While those actions are ones a prudent ERISA investment adviser would take, the district court judge was not persuaded that the terms of the document, standing alone, established that Aon had satisfied ERISA's duty of prudence. The judge explained: "That an agreement exists does not prove that it was followed, and that it might have been followed does not necessarily satisfy the duty of prudence."

Not only was the contractual language, in and of itself, insufficient to establish that the duty of prudence had been satisfied, but the same was true of the language of the detailed quarterly reports. As an example of the limitations of the quarterly investment reports, the district court concluded they would not establish the prudence of using J.P. Morgan Chase Bank benchmarks to measure the performance of the J.P. Morgan Chase Bank target-date funds, one of plaintiff's claims in the case.

(More: Excessive-fee litigation in retirement plan market moving downstream)

Second, the duty of the investment consultant was to provide prudent recommendations to the plan's fiduciary decision-makers, but the quarterly reports contained performance and other data without making any recommendations. Similarly, though Aon indicated it had made a recommendation to Safeway about a tiered investment structure, which Safeway ultimately didn't implement, the judge stated that the quarterly report didn't say anything about whether a prudent person in Aon's position would have tried to make this recommendation more than once or would have taken other steps to encourage Safeway to adopt the recommendation.

Advisers need to be aware of other limitations of contractual protection. For example, parties to a private contract are not permitted to modify the language of a statute or regulation.

For example, if there was some activity by an adviser with respect to which it was unclear whether the action constituted investment advice under the revised Department of Labor fiduciary rule, an agreement by the parties that the activity did not constitute investment advice would not preclude a court from concluding the contrary. Whether certain conduct is or isn't fiduciary in nature is a question of law, and not a matter of contract interpretation, although the parties' agreement could be a factor the court would take into account.

(More: Jerry Schlichter's fee lawsuits have left an indelible mark on the 401(k) industry)

Another limitation pertains to an individual's release of his/her claim against an investment adviser for breach of fiduciary duty. While such releases of claims by individuals are permissible, numerous courts have held that individuals do not have the authority to release the plan's claim, whether defined benefit or defined contribution, against a third party. So, the individual releasing his or her claim could still be the named plaintiff in a class-action lawsuit.

In short, while contractual language is obviously very important, investment advisers need to be aware of its limitations in certain situations.

Marcia S. Wagner is managing and founding partner of The Wagner Law Group.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

RIA Data Center

Use InvestmentNews' RIA Data Center to filter and find key information on over 1,400 fee-only registered investment advisory firms.

Rank RIAs by

Upcoming Event

Apr 30

Conference

Retirement Income Summit

Join InvestmentNews at the 12th annual Retirement Income Summit - the industry's premier retirement planning conference.Much has changed - and much remains to be learned. Attend and discuss how the future is full of opportunity for ... Learn more

Featured video

INTV

Why some retirement plan advisers think Fidelity is invading their turf

InvestmentNews editor Frederick P. Gabriel Jr. and reporter Greg Iacurci talk about this week's cover story that looks at whether Fidelity Investments is stepping on the toes of retirement plan advisers.

Latest news & opinion

Is Fidelity competing with retirement plan advisers?

As the Boston-based mutual fund giant expands the products and services it brings to the retirement market, some financial advisers say the firm is encroaching on their turf.

Gun violence hits investment strategies, sparks political debates with advisers

Screening out weapons companies has limited downside.

Whistleblower said to collect $30 million in JPMorgan case

The bank did not properly disclose that it was steering asset-management customers into investments that would be profitable for JPMorgan Chase.

Social Security underpaid 82% of dually entitled widows and widowers

Agency failed to tell survivors that they could switch to a higher retirement benefit later.

If Finra eases firm oversight of outside business activities, broker-dealers could lose revenue

Brokerage firms would no longer be able to charge reps for supervising nonaffiliated RIAs.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print