Subscribe

How to avoid a tidal wave of taxes from IRAs

Pre-retirement planning strategies help reduce tax impact from required minimum distributions.

The twilight of clients’ working years are the most crucial when it comes to softening the tax blow of required minimum distributions.
Clients in their 60s, particularly those with hefty amounts in their individual retirement accounts and 401(k)s, know they will be on the hook for RMDs from those accounts once they turn 70.5.
Unfortunately, those withdrawals can bring a host of tax problems with them. They inflate clients’ adjusted gross income, and the amount pulled from the account is also taxable. A higher AGI can subject clients to a phaseout of personal exemptions and itemized deductions if their AGI is over $250,000 for singles and $300,000 for married couples filing jointly.
This is where “pre-retirement” planning comes into the picture, notes Lyle K. Benson Jr., a certified public accountant and founder of L.K. Benson & Co. “Clients in their sixties may be in a lower bracket with a large IRA,” he noted. “They need to avoid ending up in a higher bracket at 70.5.”
How much a client expects to face in taxes from RMDs comes down to two factors: the amount of taxable dollars being pulled from the retirement account, and how much overall income is taxable, according to Jeffrey Levine, an IRA technical consultant with Ed Slott and Co.
“You’re minimizing one or the other,” he said. “You can have fewer taxable distributions coming out because you pulled the money out earlier, and you can reduce other income.”
In order to mitigate the ill effects of higher income, Mr. Benson uses incremental Roth conversions of those large qualified accounts in the years leading up to age 70.5. Bear in mind that Roth IRAs don’t call for withdrawals until after the owner dies. Effectively, income that is tax-inefficient is being replaced with tax-efficient dollars.
Meanwhile, advisers can control the flow of taxable income by considering Social Security claiming strategies. At most, up to 85% of a client’s Social Security benefits are subject to federal income taxes — meaning that 15% of that income is tax-free.
“If you have a dollar of income coming from an IRA and a dollar coming from Social Security, you have more spendable income from Social Security,” Mr. Levine said. “That’s often overlooked; advisers don’t take it into consideration.”
Another tactic worth considering is discussing a client’s ability to stay on at the workplace as an employee, even if that individual is coming in a day or two a month as a consultant. If the client’s ownership stake in the business providing the retirement plan is less than 5%, then that individual can stay on at the workplace and hold off on RMDs until he retires.
“If you still work, even if infrequently, as long as you are an employee of that company and you’re still working, then that’s good enough,” said Mr. Levine. “It’s an out-there strategy.”

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

As indexed universal life sales climb, be sure to mind the risks

Advisers need to bear in mind that this cousin of traditional universal life insurance requires unique precautions.

Donald Sterling’s battle holds harsh lessons for advisers

The L.A. Clippers owner's fight with pro basketball highlights important tax and estate strategies that may surprise you.

Advisers fall short on implementation of long-term-care insurance

Most know it's a key part of retirement planning but lack in-depth knowledge when the need for care arises.

Broker-dealers face administrative hurdles in rollout of QLAC annuity

Confusion remains over who ensures the contract purchase meets Treasury's guidelines.

Finra arbitration panel awards $500,000 to former Morgan Stanley rep

Broker and wirehouse embroiled in a three-year dispute over a promissory note.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print