Subscribe

Why activist investors are set to pull back on ESG campaigns

It's all about effectiveness, says consulting firm.

Activist investors are expected to carry out fewer environmental and social campaigns this year after the strategy proved less lucrative than other shareholder agendas, according to business consulting firm Alvarez & Marsal Inc. 

An analysis by the firm found that activist campaigns focused on operational or strategic change outperformed the market by an average of 9.4% over the past six years. By contrast, campaigns focused on environmental and social issues saw the weakest relative returns, outperforming the market by just 0.2% on average for the same period, according to a report published Tuesday. 

“As investors focus more firmly on returns in 2024 in a challenging market, we expect to see a decline in ESG-related campaigns and a renewed focus on metrics such as margin growth, cash generation and return on capital,” said Andre Medeiros, a managing director of A&M. 

A&M’s analysis is based on 550 public campaigns by shareholder activists launched between the start of 2016 and Oct. 31, 2021, against companies headquartered in Europe and the US. The firm then looked at the total shareholder return for each company over the subsequent two years following the campaign launch and compared that return to either Europe’s Stoxx 600 Index or the S&P 500 Index, depending on where the company was located.

Related Topics: , ,

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Credent Wealth Management attracts two new partner-advisors

Indiana-based $2.5B RIA has added 12 firms since it was founded in 2018.

Tech rally fuels equities rally, commodities gain

But there are headwinds including US data, Japan intervention.

Treasuries rise ahead of US inflation data

Early trade Friday paused a selloff in global bonds.

Bad day for Bitcoin, net $218M withdrawn from ETFs

Hong Kong will become latest market to launch crypto ETFs.

UBS share buybacks may be at risk from regulators

The banking group may need an extra $20B buffer under new rules.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print