Subscribe

California reaches settlement with former Conseco unit on handling of LTC claims

California Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner has reached a $500,000 settlement agreement with former Conseco Inc. unit Senior Health Insurance Company of Pennsylvania, following complaints of improper handling of claims.

California Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner has reached a $500,000 settlement agreement with former Conseco Inc. unit Senior Health Insurance Company of Pennsylvania, following complaints of improper handling of claims.

The Bensalem unit, which was formerly called Conseco Senior Health Insurance Co. but is under new management, was the subject of many complaints to his office, according to an announcement from the commissioner.

The California Department of Insurance found that Senior Health Insurance improperly denied claims on its long term care insurance policies and that its practices related to handling claims were confusing.

Mr. Poizner also conducted a market conduct examination and revealed more practices related to handling claims that violated state law, as well as coverage denials that were based on a misreading of federal law. He also determined that the company was improperly applying its policy terms and denying benefits.

As a result, it will pay a $500,000 penalty and retroactively readjust some of its policyholder claims going back to Jan. 1, 2004, paying the claims with interest.

In response to Mr. Poizner’s announcement, former parent company Conseco of Carmel, Ind., stressed that it now operates separately from Senior Health Insurance and that Conseco isn’t a party to the settlement.

Conseco also said that Senior Health Insurance thinks that the problems detailed in the settlement — which covers 2004 to 2007 — were due to inconsistent interpretation of the policies’ terms under state regulations. However, the insurer spent 2007 and 2008, the last two years that Conseco owned Senior Health Insurance, making improvements to ensure that the carrier was complying with regulatory requirements.

Last November, Conseco shifted Senior Health Insurance and its LTC insurance books of business into an independent trust that has since been severed from the parent. The move was panned by consumer advocates and state regulators, including Mr. Poizner, who were concerned that the LTC consumers would be hurt as a result.

“We implemented many process improvements to ensure that the company was complying with all regulatory requirements in our relationships with our consumers,” Conseco spokeswoman Barbara Ciesemier wrote in an e-mail statement. “We understand that [Senior Health Insurance] has continued to make process improvements since its separation from Conseco.”

Attempts to reach Senior Health Insurance for comment weren’t successful.

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Stuck in the middle

Newly elected Finra board member whose firm is connected to a bribery scandal says the matter should have no effect on his ability to serve.

Fighting for market share in the LTC business

A handful of publicly held life insurers dominate the market for traditional long-term-care insurance, but mutual life insurers are beginning to make inroads with agents and financial advisers.

Breaking up is hard to do – especially with annuities

When a client came to his office bearing her new divorce decree, adviser Dale Russell became the bearer…

Longevity insurance promising – but higher rates would help

The Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service like it, as do many estate-planning experts. Now all…

Long-term care: Cutting back coverage

When a 74-year-old client visited Ellen R. Siegel six years ago with news of an upcoming 12% rate increase on the premium of her long-term-care insurance, the adviser knew she had to navigate the potential benefit cuts with the precision of a surgeon.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print