Subscribe

Retention headache: ING settles charges it failed to archive email

Agrees to pay $1.2M to close Finra enforcement action; five affiliates allegedly failed to retain millions of messages

Five ING Groep N.V. affiliates agreed to pay $1.2 million to Finra to settle allegations they failed for six years to retain — and in some cases, review — millions of emails to and from brokers.
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. said electronic messages sent to hundreds of employees and associated persons weren’t kept and, therefore, were not properly reviewed. Four ING affiliates also failed to review millions of emails between January 2005 and May 2011 — even though the messages had been flagged for review by the firms’ compliance programs. Finra claims the software wasn’t configured correctly.
“Email retention and review continues to be an important regulatory responsibility and issue of concern for Finra,” said Brad Bennett, Finra’s enforcement chief.
As part of the settlement, ING Financial Advisors LLC, ING Financial Partners Inc., ING Investment Advisors LLC, Directed Services LLC, and ING America Equities Inc. neither admitted nor denied the allegations.
According to Finra, four of the firms failed to set up systems that archived certain types of emails, including those using alternate email addresses, any messages sent to distribution lists, emails received as blind carbon copies and those sent through third-party systems.
ING issued a statement noting that, while the archiving issues did not affect customers, the affiliates had informed Finra about the lack of oversight in October 2010.
“The broker-dealers also undertook an extensive internal review of their policies, procedures and systems, and have cooperated fully with Finra’s investigation,” the company said. “As a result, the impacted broker-dealers have engaged in significant efforts to improve their email retention and supervisory practices.”
Patrick Burns, president of Advanced Regulatory Compliance, said email procedures and policies have been an area of focus for Finra for the past five years since certain legal cases and the Securities and Exchange Commission ”recognized that there’s interesting stuff in emails.”
Regulators believe that firms may have an ability to better supervise the practices of registered representatives if they can supervise their emails, Mr. Burns said.

Related Topics:

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Celebration of women fostering diversity in the financial advice profession

Honoring the 2020 and 2019 InvestmentNews Women to Watch for their achievements and dedication to improving the financial advice profession.

Merrill Lynch veteran Michelle Avan dies

Avan recently became SVP and head of global women's and under-represented talent strategy, global human resources for Bank of America.

Finalists for Women in Asset Management Awards announced

More than 100 individuals were named on the short list for awards in 16 categories; the winners will be announced on Sept. 9.

Rethinking advisory fees means figuring out value

Most advisers still charge AUM-based fees, but that's not likely to be the case in 10 years, according to Bob Veres. Some advisers are now experimenting with alternative fee models.

Advisers need focus on growth and relationships, especially now

Business development expert Robyn Crane believes financial advisers need to be taking advantage of this unique time.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print