Subscribe

Tax reform: Retirement industry dodges bullet as Senate and House bills advance

Concerns over strict limits on pre-tax 401(k) savings and the upending of non-qualified deferred compensation plans are receding.

The retirement industry can breathe a collective sigh of relief today as the House and Senate tax bills advance in their respective chambers.

Despite all the doomsday talk relative to setting strict limits on pre-tax 401(k) contributions and gutting non-qualified deferred compensation plans, retirement savings has largely emerged unscathed and intact.

“Those fears didn’t come to pass. For the most part, the retirement system was spared,” Kevin Walsh, an associate at Groom Law Group, said. “Whereas two weeks ago there was a fair amount of terror … it’s looking better.”

In the weeks and months leading up to early November, when the House released the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the Trump administration and congressional Republican leaders had telegraphed a few tax breaks that would be preserved: namely, those affecting retirement savings, charitable giving and mortgage interest payments.

FUNDING GAP

Despite that proclamation, concern began to grow that Republicans would limit pre-tax 401(k) contributions, to as low as $2,400 from the current $18,000 threshold, and mandate savings beyond this limit go to Roth accounts. That would help Congress offset the revenue loss from its tax-cut agenda.

The debate came to a head when President Donald J. Trump signaled in a Twitter message that there would be “NO change to your 401(k).”

The so-called “Rothification” didn’t come to pass, either in the bill that passed the House or the one that passed the Senate Finance Committee, both of which occurred Nov. 16.

The closest it came to emerging was in a proposed amendment filed by Sen. Orrin Hatch, Republican from Utah and chairman of the Finance committee, that would have required catch-up contributions for those over age 50 to be made to Roth accounts. That provision didn’t make it into the amended Senate bill that passed the committee.

“The industry should feel really good about how it came together and was able to fend off efforts to use the 401(k) system as a piggy bank to pay for corporate tax cuts,” Brian Graff, CEO of the American Retirement Association, said.

SURPRISE PROVISIONS

However, Congress sent shock waves through the retirement community through surprise provisions in both chambers’ bills that essentially flipped the tax treatment of non-qualified deferred compensation plans on its head.

That would have ended tax deferral in vehicles such as “401(k) mirror plans,” often used by company executives to save money above 401(k) contribution limits, and would have essentially rendered such plans pointless, Mr. Graff said.

However, the provision was ultimately stricken from both bills.

“It looks for now that the other big bullet that was coming for the industry was left out,” Mr. Walsh of Groom Law Group said Thursday at a Worldwide Employee Benefits Network event in New York.

RECHARACTERIZATIONS

The tax treatment of retirement savings has emerged with at least one black eye, though: both chambers would repeal use of recharacterizations of Roth IRA conversions. Under current law, taxpayers who convert a pre-tax IRA to a Roth account have the ability to undo, or recharacterize, it within a certain time frame.

And it’s not assured issues around pre-tax savings and deferred compensation won’t re-emerge as the tax debate continues and Republicans try to get a bill to the president for signature by year’s end.

“I think these bills, they’re trying to cut taxes in other areas, and that costs money,” John Scott, director of retirement savings at The Pew Charitable Trusts, said. “There’s a concern that things could change. We’re still only partly through the process.”

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

SEC issues FAQs on investment advice rule

The agency published answers to four questions about Form CRS.

SEC proposes tougher sales rule for exchange-traded products

The agency, concerned about consumer protection, says clients need a baseline understanding of product risk

Pete Buttigieg proposes a ‘public’ 401(k) program

The proposal is similar to others seeking to improve access to workplace retirement plans but would require an employer match.

DOL digital 401(k) rule not digital enough, industry says

Some stakeholders say the disclosure proposal is still paper-centric and should take into account newer technologies.

Five brokers lose Ohio National lawsuit over annuity commissions

Judge rules the brokers weren't beneficiaries of the selling agreement between the insurer and broker-dealers.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print