Subscribe

Congressional sit-in disrupted by failed attempt to override veto of anti-DOL fiduciary rule bill

Speaker of the House Paul Ryan

Attempt to override the presidential veto of an anti-DOL fiduciary rule bill was used to interrupt a protest demanding action on gun-control legislation.

The House of Representatives failed Wednesday night to override a presidential veto of a resolution that would kill a Labor Department investment advice regulation.

The vote, which occurred around 10:30 p.m., was used by House Republicans to break up a sit-in by Democratic lawmakers demanding action on gun-control legislation. The Democratic demonstration had shut down the House floor since late Wednesday morning.

The veto override passed, 239-180, on a party-line vote, falling well short of the two-thirds majority needed to overcome President Barack Obama’s rejection of the resolution.

The failure of the effort was expected, as Democrats have remained steadfast in supporting the DOL rule, which requires financial advisers to act in the best interests of their clients in retirement accounts.

(More: Everything you need to know about the DOL fiduciary rule as it develops)

No House Democrat supported the resolution when it was originally voted on in late April. Only three Senate Democrats backed it when that chamber voted in late May. Mr. Obama vetoed the legislation earlier this month.

Republicans have been just as determined in opposing the rule. Echoing financial industry arguments, they say it will significantly increase liability risk and regulatory costs for advisers and make advice too expensive for investors with modest assets.

(Related: DOL’s Thomas Perez confident anti-fiduciary rule lawsuits will fail)

Proponents say the rule, which was finalized in April, would protect investors from conflicted advice that results in sales of high-fee products that erode retirement savings.

Before the veto-override vote Wednesday, 65 members of the Financial Planning Association met with about 100 lawmakers and congressional staff as part of its annual advocacy day.

Even though the regulation seems to be safe from legislative threats, they urged House members to uphold Mr. Obama’s veto.

“We’re not taking anything for granted,” Karen Nystrom, FPA director of advocacy, said in an interview Wednesday morning.

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Wealth firms must prepare for demise of non-competes, despite legal challenges to FTC rule

A growing sentiment against restricting employee moves could affect non-solicitation, too.

FPA, CFP Board diverge on DOL investment advice proposal

While the CFP Board supports the proposal, the FPA has expressed concerns about the DOL rule potentially raising compliance costs for members, increasing the cost of advice and reducing access to advice for some.

Braxton encourages RIAs to see investing in diversity as a business strategy

‘If a firm values its human capital, then it will make an investment to make sure that their talent can flourish for the advancement of the bottom line,’ says Lazetta Rainey Braxton, co-CEO of 2050 Wealth Partners.

Bill chips away at SALT block but comes with drawbacks, advisors say

'I’d love to see the [full] SALT deduction come back but not if it means rates go up,' one advisor says.

Former Morgan Stanley broker running for office reviewing $147K award

Deborah Adeimy claimed firm blocked her from running in GOP primary, aide says 'we're unclear how award figure was calculated.'

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print