Subscribe

‘Fire sale’ probably helped ignite surge in VA sales

Advisers notified clients about planned reduction in features, hike in fees

Insurers saw a sizable rise in the sale of variable annuities in the fourth quarter. While an improving stock market no doubt helped fuel the surge, the spike may also may have been the result of a push to sell existing VAs before insurers cut back on product features.
First, the numbers. Sales of variable annuities jumped by 10% in 2010, reaching $140.5 billion. Meanwhile, fourth-quarter sales climbed a sizeable 17%, compared with the year-earlier period, according to LIMRA. In general, sales of individual annuity fell 7% to $221.3 billion, the association said.
Joseph Montminy, assistant vice president for annuity research at LIMRA, attributed the flood of VA sales to a surging equities market and interest in guaranteed income riders.
But advisers said other forces were in play, as well. Specifically, financial advisers pointed to a big sales push at the end of last year as carriers prepared to eliminate attractive product features and raise fees.
For instance, late last year, Prudential Financial Inc. said it would replace its Highest Daily Lifetime 6 Plus with the less generous Highest Daily Lifetime Income Benefit, effective Jan. 24.
(See the latest rankings of the largest and top-selling variable annuities.)
Meanwhile, MetLife Inc. changed the internal calculation for new sales of its guaranteed minimum income benefit, effective Feb. 28, thus lowering the amount of income clients get when they activate the rider.
“I would say undoubtedly there was some aspect of fire sale activity in the fourth quarter,” said Steven Schwartz, an analyst with Raymond James and Associates Inc.
Lincoln National Corp. had announced in December that they were raising fees on it riders, and Mr. Schwartz said it was “well known” by early to mid-December that Prudential would make changes. “Reps get their clients to buy before the negative changes occur,” he noted.
Advisers said that they didn’t foist sales on clients simply because product features were about to change. Rather, they were mindful of the effective dates of the changes if investors were already planning to make a purchase.
“You have to do the right thing for the right folks,” said Rich Dragotta, a branch manager with LPL Financial. “If a client is on the fence and hasn’t gotten back to you after a presentation, you can alert them to the fact that they have two or three weeks [until the change].”

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Stocks rise following hot March inflation

The S&P 500 is poised to extend gains on tech earnings while short-term Treasury yields fell following brisk rise in Fed’s preferred inflation gauge.

Fed will cut once before presidential election, says Howard Lutnick

Cantor Fitzgerald’s chief executive predicts the central bank will “show off a little bit” just before voters head to the polls.

Tech stocks tumble after Meta misses on earnings

The Nasdaq 100 shed $400B, the Facebook parent slumped by as much as 16%, and AI believers are left on tenterhooks.

Concord ups the ante on Hipgnosis takeover battle

The music rights investor increased its bid to own the London-listed company’s enviable library of songs from iconic acts.

Trump Media doubles down on illegal short-selling claims

Parent company of Truth Social has flagged concerns that so-called "naked" short sales are happening.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print