Subscribe

The Hartford pulls back on VA pullback — in some states

In a few states, the Hartford has informed some clients they can keep their existing investment options. Which ones? Darla Mercado has the details.

Insurance regulators in The Hartford Life & Annuity Insurance Co.’s home state of Connecticut has given the green light to the insurer’s plan to force legacy variable annuity clients to switch to conservative investments. But it looks like the insurer’s requirement won’t apply to clients who resided in Connecticut when they bought their contracts.
In a June 21 filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the life insurer noted that variable annuity investors in a handful of states, including Connecticut, would not be subject to a series of new investment restrictions that were announced in May.
The insurer applied the restrictions to existing account balances in an array of contracts, including the Director M line of VAs. Certain clients with riders from the Lifetime Income Builder suite were told they needed to reallocate their investments into something more conservative.
Hartford’s lineup of acceptable options includes funds that require a minimum 40% allocation to fixed income and a risk-based asset allocation model with a bond allocation that’s upward of 40%. Customers who fail to act by Oct. 4 will lose their living benefit altogether, Hartford said in its previous filing.
But due to differences in the language of the original VA contracts in different states, clients in some locations won’t be subject to these limitations — provided they were living in those states when they bought the contract, confirmed Hartford spokesman David Collins.
In fact, some clients in those states received notice erroneously that they would need to change their allocations. Hartford is rectifying the issue.
“After our initial communication to contract holders about changes to their annuity features, we determined that some of the contract holders received the investment restriction in error,” Mr. Collins said. “We are offering to restore the original allocations to any clients who may have made changes to their portfolios.”
Residents in Connecticut won’t be subject to investment restrictions for the Principal First Preferred contract, Lifetime Income Builder II and the Lifetime Income Foundation, according to the June 21 filing.
New Jersey clients won’t have investment restrictions for the Lifetime Income Builder, LIB II and Lifetime Income Foundation, per the SEC filing.
Meanwhile, residents in New York won’t be subject to investment restrictions if they have Hartford’s Lifetime Income Builder, LIB II, the Lifetime Income Builder Selects and the Lifetime Income Foundation features. Likewise, clients in Oregon won’t be subject to investment restrictions for Hartford’s Lifetime Income Builder, according to the filing.
Though regulators in Connecticut permitted the previous round of investment restrictions to go through, the department didn’t have anything to do with the exemption of state residents from the restrictions.
“The Hartford has made no recent filing with the insurance department with regard to these changes,” said Donna Tommelleo, a spokeswoman with the Connecticut insurance department. “The previously approved forms had language that would have allowed such actions.”

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

As indexed universal life sales climb, be sure to mind the risks

Advisers need to bear in mind that this cousin of traditional universal life insurance requires unique precautions.

Donald Sterling’s battle holds harsh lessons for advisers

The L.A. Clippers owner's fight with pro basketball highlights important tax and estate strategies that may surprise you.

Advisers fall short on implementation of long-term-care insurance

Most know it's a key part of retirement planning but lack in-depth knowledge when the need for care arises.

Broker-dealers face administrative hurdles in rollout of QLAC annuity

Confusion remains over who ensures the contract purchase meets Treasury's guidelines.

Finra arbitration panel awards $500,000 to former Morgan Stanley rep

Broker and wirehouse embroiled in a three-year dispute over a promissory note.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print